LEADER 00752nam0-22003011i-450- 001 990000045250403321 035 $a000004525 035 $aFED01000004525 035 $a(Aleph)000004525FED01 035 $a000004525 100 $a20011111d--------km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 105 $ay-------001yy 200 1 $aBeton armé$fVictor Forestier. 205 $a13. ed. 210 $aParis$cDunod$d1940 215 $aXV, 307, XCVI p.$d15 cm 225 1 $aAgendas Dunod 610 0 $aCemento armato 676 $a620.137 700 1$aForestier,$bVictor 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990000045250403321 952 $a13 AR 13 A 26$b17806$fFINBC 959 $aFINBC 997 $aUNINA DB $aING01 LEADER 03258nam 22005535 450 001 996433047303316 005 20240205235914.0 010 $a3-11-070853-1 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110708530 035 $a(CKB)5590000000533500 035 $a(DE-B1597)554894 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110708530 035 $aEBL7014900 035 $a(AU-PeEL)EBL7014900 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7014900 035 $a(EXLCZ)995590000000533500 100 $a20210621h20212021 fg 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||#|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDocumentation and Argument in Early China $eThe Shŕngsh? ?? (Venerated Documents) and the Sh? Traditions /$fDirk Meyer 210 1$aBerlin ;$aBoston :$cDe Gruyter Mouton,$d[2021] 210 4$d©2021 215 $a1 online resource (X, 281 p.) 225 0 $aLibrary of Sinology ;$v5 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a3-11-070841-8 327 $tFrontmatter --$tAcknowledgements --$tContents --$tIntroduction --$t1 Sh? traditions and philosophical discourse --$t2 Archiving cultural capital --$t3 The materiality of meaning networks --$t4 Moulds of discourse --$t5 Sh? traditions in narrative --$t6 Sh? genre in manuscript cultures --$t7 Conclusion: the Sh? and political argument in early China --$tBibliorgraph --$tIndex 330 $aThis study uncovers the traditions behind the formative Classic Shŕngsh? (Venerated Documents). It is the first to establish these traditions-"Sh?" (Documents)-as a historically evolving practice of thought-production. By focusing on the literary form of the argument, it interprets the "Sh?" as fluid text material that embodies the ever-changing cultural capital of projected conceptual communities. By showing how these communities actualised the "Sh?" according to their changing visions of history and evolving group interests, the study establishes that by the Warring States period (ca. 453-221 BC) the "Sh?" had become a literary genre employed by diverse groups to legitimize their own arguments. Through forms of textual performance, the "Sh?" gave even peripheral communities the means to participate in political discourse by conferring their ideas with ancient authority. Analysing this dynamic environment of socio-political and philosophical change, this study speaks to the Early China field, as well as to those interested in meaning production and foundational text formation more widely. 410 0$aLibrary of Sinology [LOS] 606 $aHISTORY / Asia / China$2bisacsh 610 $aChinese Philosophy. 610 $aCodicology. 610 $aGenre. 610 $aText Performance. 610 $aText formation. 610 $aWarring States Period. 610 $aZhou Dynasty. 615 7$aHISTORY / Asia / China. 700 $aMeyer$b Dirk$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01217106 712 02$aJao Tsung-I Academy of Sinology$4fnd$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/fnd 801 0$bDE-B1597 801 1$bDE-B1597 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996433047303316 996 $aDocumentation and Argument in Early China$92814680 997 $aUNISA