LEADER 01856nam  2200349Ia 450 
001 996409035503316
005 20220120164238.0
024 8 $aocn946881515
035   $a(CKB)4940000000597720
035   $a(OCoLC)946881515
035   $a(OCoLC)ocn946881515
035   $a(OCoLC)9930299500971
035   $a(EXLCZ)994940000000597720
100   $a20160418d1692      uy             |
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurbn#|||a|bb|
200 13$aAn argument proving, that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the Royal family, to the throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the English government, and prescribed by it$b[electronic resource] $ein opposition to all the false and treacherous hypotheses, of usurpation, conquest, desertion, and of taking the powers that are upon content /$fby Samuel Johnson
210   $aLondon $cPrinted for the author$d1692
215   $a62, [2] p
300   $aReproduction of original in: Blairs College.
607   $aGreat Britain$xHistory$yJames II, 1685-1688$vPamphlets
607   $aGreat Britain$xHistory$yWilliam and Mary, 1689-1702$vPamphlets
607   $aGreat Britain$xKings and rulers$xSuccession$vEarly works to 1800
610  6$aDiscourses on government and political theory
610  6$aPolitical tracts
700   $aJohnson$b Samuel$f1649-1703.$01001074
801  0$bUMI
801  1$bUMI
906   $aBOOK
912   $a996409035503316
996   $aAn argument proving that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to the throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the English government, and prescribed by it$92378715
997   $aUNISA