LEADER 01808nam  2200373 n 450 
001 996396211203316
005 20221108040219.0
035   $a(CKB)4330000000332405
035   $a(EEBO)2248542315
035   $a(UnM)99852230
035   $a(EXLCZ)994330000000332405
100   $a19920427d1634      uy             |
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurbn||||a|bb|
200 02$aA necessitie of separation from the Church of England, prooved by the nonconformists principles$b[electronic resource] $eSpecially opposed vnto Dr. Ames, his Fresh suit against humane ceremonies, in the point of separation only. Also Dr. Laiton, Mr. Dayrel, and Mr. Bradshaw, are here answered, wherein they have written against us. With a table in the later end, of the principal occurrents in this treatise. By Iohn Canne, pastor of the ancient English church, in Amsterdam
210   $a[Amsterdam] $cPrinted [by the successors of Giles Thorp]$din the yeare 1634
215   $a[8], 264, [12] p
300   $aIn part a reply to: Ames, William.  A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship.
300   $aIdentification of printer from STC.
300   $aRunning title reads: A necessitie of separation, proved by the nonconformists principles.
300   $aIncludes index and a final errata leaf.
300   $aReproduction of the original in the British Library.
330   $aeebo-0018
606   $aDissenters, Religious$zEngland$vEarly works to 1800
615  0$aDissenters, Religious
700   $aCanne$b John$fd. 1667?$01002710
801  0$bCu-RivES
801  1$bCu-RivES
801  2$bCStRLIN
801  2$bWaOLN
906   $aBOOK
912   $a996396211203316
996   $aA necessitie of separation from the Church of England, prooved by the nonconformists principles$92395559
997   $aUNISA