LEADER 01847nam  2200373 n 450 
001 996395621403316
005 20200824120935.0
035   $a(CKB)4330000000312938
035   $a(EEBO)2240873923
035   $a(UnM)99842857e
035   $a(UnM)99842857
035   $a(EXLCZ)994330000000312938
100   $a19910529d1631      uy             |
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurbn||||a|bb|
200 04$aThe doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated$b[electronic resource] $ein a confutation of a treatise of the Sabbath, written by M. Edward Breerwood against M. Nic. Byfield, wherein these five things are maintained: first, that the fourth Commandement is given to the servant and not to the master onely. Seecondly, that the fourth Commandement is morall. Thirdly, that our owne light workes as well as gainefull and toilesome are forbidden on the Sabbath. Fourthly, that the Lords day is of divine institution. Fifthly, that the Sabbath was instituted from the beginning. By the industrie of an unworthy labourer in Gods vineyard, Richard Byfield, pastor in Long Ditton in Surrey
210   $aLondon $cImprinted by Felix Kyngston for Philemon Stephens and Christopher Meredith at the golden Lyon in Pauls Church-yard$d1631
215   $a[20], 227, [1] p
300   $aA reply to: Brerewood, Edward.  A learned treatise of the Sabbath.
300   $aReproduction of the original in the University of Chicago Library.
330   $aeebo-0165
606   $aSabbath$vEarly works to 1800
606   $aSunday$vEarly works to 1800
615  0$aSabbath
615  0$aSunday
700   $aByfield$b Richard$f1598?-1664.$01001996
801  0$bCu-RivES
801  1$bCu-RivES
801  2$bCStRLIN
801  2$bWaOLN
906   $aBOOK
912   $a996395621403316
996   $aThe doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated$92411883
997   $aUNISA