LEADER 01371nam 2200373 n 450 001 996393288703316 005 20230920153446.0 035 $a(GALE)1134600800 035 $a(Uk-ES)006420196 035 $a(OCoLC)642614558 035 $a(CU-RivES)T48378 035 $a(EXLCZ)993360000000325634 100 $a20790922d1716 uy | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n||||||||n 200 00$aSir, you are hereby requir'd to appear personally before the right Reverend father in God, Francis by divine permission, Lord Bishop of Rochester, ..$b[electronic resource] 210 $a[Rochester $cs.n.$d1716] 215 $a1 online resource (1 sheet ([1] p.) ) 300 $aAt his primary visitation. 300 $aTitle from pening lines of text. 300 $aReproduction of original from British Library. 330 $aeebo-0018 606 $aVisitations, Ecclesiastical$zEngland$vEarly works to 1800 615 0$aVisitations, Ecclesiastical 701 $aAtterbury$b Francis$f1662-1732.$01001436 801 0$bUk-ES 801 1$bUk-ES 801 2$bCStRLIN 801 2$bCU-RivES 801 2$bCengage Gale 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996393288703316 996 $aSir, you are hereby requir'd to appear personally before the right Reverend father in God, Francis by divine permission, Lord Bishop of Rochester, .$92386795 997 $aUNISA LEADER 04890nam 2200829 450 001 9910780511003321 005 20230912154841.0 010 $a1-4426-5492-9 010 $a0-8020-6772-7 010 $a1-4426-7367-2 024 7 $a10.3138/9781442673670 035 $a(CKB)2430000000000909 035 $a(OCoLC)244766908 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10200759 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000375925 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11283440 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000375925 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10327428 035 $a(PQKB)10158444 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001420506 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12529714 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001420506 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11403484 035 $a(PQKB)11482953 035 $a(CaPaEBR)417431 035 $a(CaBNvSL)thg00600215 035 $a(DE-B1597)464383 035 $a(OCoLC)944178302 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781442673670 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4671407 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11257117 035 $a(OCoLC)958581096 035 $a(dli)HEB06739 035 $a(MiU)MIU01000000000000012925628 035 $a(VaAlCD)20.500.12592/j4gs6g 035 $a(schport)gibson_crkn/2009-12-01/5/417431 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4671407 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3251205 035 $a(EXLCZ)992430000000000909 100 $a20160921h19901990 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aCulture, communication, and national identity $ethe case of Canadian television /$fRichard Collins 210 1$aToronto, [Ontario] ;$aBuffalo, [New York] ;$aLondon, [England] :$cUniversity of Toronto Press,$d1990. 210 4$dİ1990 215 $a1 online resource (390 p.) 225 0 $aHeritage 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a0-8020-4699-1 311 $a0-8020-2733-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tPreface: The Martian View -- $tAcknowledgments -- $t1. Introduction -- $t2. Structure and Historical Development of Canadian Television -- $t3. 1968 and After: The Public Sector and the Market from the Broadcasting Act to Caplan/Sauvageau -- $t4. Nationalism -- $t5. Maximization of Satisfaction: The Market Paradigm -- $t6. Dependency Theory and Television in Canada -- $t7. The Intellectuals, Television, and the Two Solitudes -- $t8. The Television Audience -- $t9. National Culture; or, Where Is Here? -- $t10. The Single Dramas: La Misere Canadienne -- $t11. The Continental Culture and Canadian Television Drama: The Mini Series -- $t12. Conclusion -- $tReferences -- $tIndex 330 $a?There can be no political sovereignty without culture sovereignty.? So argued the CBC in 1985 in its evidence to the Caplan/Sauvageau Task Force on Broadcasting Policy. Richard Collins challenges this assumption. He argues in this study of nationalism and Canadian television policy that Canada?s political sovereignty depends much less on Canadian content in television than has generally been accepted. His analysis focuses on television drama, at the centre of television policy in the 1980s.Collins questions the conventional image of Canada as a weak national entity undermined by its population?s predilection for foreign television. Rather, he argues, Canada is held together, not by a shared repertoire of symbols, a national culture, but by other social forces, notably political institutions. Collins maintains that important advantages actually and potentially flow from Canada?s wear national symbolic culture. Rethinking the relationships between television and society in Canada may yield a more successful broadcasting policy, more popular television programming, and a better understanding of the links between culture and the body politic. As the European Community moves closer to political unity, the Canadian case may become more relevant to Europe, which, Collins suggests, already fears the ?Canadianization? of its television. He maintains that a European multilingual society, without a shared culture or common European audio-visual sphere and with viewers watching foreign television, can survive successfully as a political entity ? just as Canada has. 606 $aTelevision broadcasting$xSocial aspects$zCanada 606 $aTelevision and politics$zCanada 606 $aNationalism$zCanada 615 0$aTelevision broadcasting$xSocial aspects 615 0$aTelevision and politics 615 0$aNationalism 676 $a384.540971 700 $aCollins$b Richard$055625 701 $aLaird$b Walter Roy$f1950-$01482896 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910780511003321 996 $aCulture, communication, and national identity$93760123 997 $aUNINA