LEADER 01586nam  2200373 n 450 
001 996392799103316
005 20200824121802.0
035   $a(CKB)4940000000113024
035   $a(EEBO)2240946682
035   $a(UnM)99873494e
035   $a(UnM)99873494
035   $a(EXLCZ)994940000000113024
100   $a19851024d1641      uy             |
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurbn||||a|bb|
200 14$aThe argument of Nicholas Fuller of Grayes Inne esquire, in the case of Tho. Lad, and Rich. Mansell his clients$b[electronic resource] $eWherein it is plainly proved, that the ecclesiasticall commissioners have no power by their commission, to imprison, or to fine any of his Majesties subjects, or to put them to the oath ex officio
210   $aLondon $cPrinted for N. Vavasour$d1641
215   $a[4], 32 p. $cport
300   $aFrontispiece port.: William Laud Arch-B: of Canterbury Prymat of England. W.M. sculp.
300   $aReproduction of the original in the British Library.
330   $aeebo-0018
606   $aEcclesiastical law$zEngland$vEarly works to 1800
607   $aGreat Britain$xReligion$y17th century$vEarly works to 1800
615  0$aEcclesiastical law
700   $aFuller$b Nicholas$f1543-1620.$01007971
701   $aMarshall$b William$ffl. 1650.$01010750
801  0$bCu-RivES
801  1$bCu-RivES
801  2$bCStRLIN
801  2$bWaOLN
906   $aBOOK
912   $a996392799103316
996   $aThe argument of Nicholas Fuller of Grayes Inne esquire, in the case of Tho. Lad, and Rich. Mansell his clients$92408603
997   $aUNISA