LEADER 01867nam  2200373Ia 450 
001 996391592703316
005 20221108074147.0
035   $a(CKB)1000000000660079
035   $a(EEBO)2248516979
035   $a(UnM)99898385
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000660079
100   $a19990322d1525      uy             |
101 0 $alat
135   $aurbn||||a|bb|
200 00$aSum, es fui, esse, essendi, do, du[m]. ins futurus$b[electronic resource] $eIndicatiuo modo su[m], es, est. Et pluraliter sumus estis sunt. ..
210   $a[London] $cExplicit tractatul[us] verboru[m] defectiuorum et anormalorum. Impressus per Wynandum de Worde$d[1525?]
215   $a[8] p
300   $aTitle from opening words of text.
300   $aImprint from colophon.
300   $aThough this is not the Stanbridge text, in view of the heading it seems wise to [group this item with Stanbridge's works] for purposes of comparison and distinction. The Stanbridge section begins on A2v of STC 23155.4: 'Sum is fui esse futurus Indicatiuo modo tem/pore presenti sum I am es est. In pl're sumus/ estis sūt.' Horman's Introductorium contains a similar though different section on F1r of STC 13809: 'Sum. is. fui. esse. essendi. essendo. essundū./ ens. futurus./ Indicatiuo presenti Sum. es. est. sumus/ estis. sunt.'--STC.
300   $aSignatures: A⁴.
300   $aReproduction of the original in the Bodleian Library, Oxford, England.
330   $aeebo-0014
606   $aLatin language$xGrammar$vEarly works to 1500
615  0$aLatin language$xGrammar
701   $aHorman$b William$fd. 1535.$01003050
701   $aStanbridge$b John$f1463-1510.$0196826
801  0$bCu-RivES
801  1$bCu-RivES
801  2$bWaOLN
906   $aBOOK
912   $a996391592703316
996   $aSum, es fui, esse, essendi, do, du. ins futurus$92302690
997   $aUNISA