LEADER 02403nam 2200409 n 450 001 996390126703316 005 20200824120940.0 035 $a(CKB)4940000000100715 035 $a(EEBO)2264171529 035 $a(UnM)99834071e 035 $a(UnM)99834071 035 $a(EXLCZ)994940000000100715 100 $a19970212d1689 uy | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||a|bb| 200 14$aThe letter which was sent to the author of the doctrine of passive obedience and jure divino disproved, &c. answered and refuted$b[electronic resource] $ewherein is proved, that monarchy was not originally from God. That kings are not by divine appointment, but that all government proceeds from the people. That the obedience required in Scripture, is to the laws of the land, and no otherwise. That resisting of arbitary power is lawful. That the oath of allegiance to to the late King James was dissolved before the Prince of Orange (our present King) landed. That upon the non-performance of an oath on one side, the other becomes void, is plainly prov'd from several examples in scripture. That protection is the only cause of allegiance, and that obedience or allegiance is due to the present government is proved from Scripture, law and reason; and those texts of scriptures which relate to government, or monarchy, are explained 205 $aThe second edition. 210 $aLondon $cprinted for Tho. Harrison at the White Swan over against the West-end of the Royal Exchange in Cornhil$d1689 215 $a[2], 37, [1] p 300 $aFrom the title page of the first edition,"By a true son of the Church of England". 300 $aSigned at end: A.A. 300 $aWing attributes work to N.N. 300 $aReproduction of the original at the Trinity College Library, Dublin, Ireland. 330 $aeebo-0159 606 $aDivine right of kings$vControversial literature$vEarly works to 1800 615 0$aDivine right of kings 700 $aTrue son of the Church of England$01006878 702 $aTrue son of the Church of England$4aut 702 $aN. N$4aut 702 $aA. A$4aut 801 0$bCu-RivES 801 1$bCu-RivES 801 2$bWaOLN 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996390126703316 996 $aThe letter which was sent to the author of the doctrine of passive obedience and jure divino disproved, &c. answered and refuted$92390517 997 $aUNISA