LEADER 02084nam  2200373Ia 450 
001 996388435403316
005 20200824132404.0
035   $a(CKB)1000000000634267
035   $a(EEBO)2240911915
035   $a(OCoLC)ocm13175028e
035   $a(OCoLC)13175028
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000634267
100   $a19860220d1658      uy             |
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurbn||||a|bb|
200 12$aA defence of Mr. John Cotton from the imputation of selfe contradiction, charged on him by Mr. Dan. Cavvdrey$b[electronic resource] /$fwritten by himselfe not long before his death ; whereunto is prefixed, an answer to a late treatise of the said Mr. Cavvdrey about the nature of schisme, by John Owen ..
210   $aOxford $cPrinted by H. Hall for T. Robinson$d1658
215   $a2 pts. in 1 vol. (100, 83 p.)
300   $aCawdrey first attacked Cotton in 1645, in a work entitled, "Vindiciae clavium." Cotton answered in "The way of the Congregationall churches cleared," 1648.  Cawdrey then published "The inconsistencie of the independent way," 1651.  Cotton's "Defence" is a reply to the charges against him in the last named work.
300   $aThe controversy between Cawdrey and Owen is as follows: Owen's work "Of schism" appeared in 1657, and was answered by Cawdrey in "Independencie, a great schism." Owen rejoined in "A review of the true nature of schism," whereupon Cawdrey published "Independency further proved to be a schism," 1658. This was the "late treatise" to which the preface "Of schisme" of the present work is a reply.
300   $aReproduction of original in Bodleian Library.
330   $aeebo-0014
606   $aSchism$vEarly works to 1800
615  0$aSchism
700   $aCotton$b John$f1584-1652.$0793681
701  2$aOwen$b John$f1616-1683.$01002389
801  0$bEAA
801  1$bEAA
801  2$bm/c
801  2$bWaOLN
906   $aBOOK
912   $a996388435403316
996   $aA defence of Mr. John Cotton from the imputation of selfe contradiction, charged on him by Mr. Dan. Cavvdrey$92367045
997   $aUNISA