LEADER 01783nam 2200385 n 450 001 996386229903316 005 20221108041056.0 035 $a(CKB)1000000000608853 035 $a(EEBO)2240857518 035 $a(UnM)99856053 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000608853 100 $a19920918d1589 uy | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||a|bb| 200 12$aA politike discourse most excellent for this time present: composed by a French gentleman, against those of the League, which went about to perswade the King to breake the allyance with England, and to confirme it with Spaine$b[electronic resource] 210 $aLondon $cPrinted by Iohn VVoolfe$d1589 215 $a[4], 27 [i.e. 41], [3] p 300 $aA translation of: Gentil-homme francois. Discours politique, tres-excellent pour le temps present. 300 $aTranslator's note "To the discrete and vertuous reader" signed: Francis Mar., i.e. Francesco Marquino. 300 $aRunning title reads: A discourse of the league, betweene France and England. 300 $aP. 41 misnumbered 27. 300 $aThe last leaf is blank. 300 $aReproduction of the original in the Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery. 330 $aeebo-0113 607 $aFrance$xHistory$yHenry III, 1574-1589$vEarly works to 1800 701 $aMarquino$b Francesco$01017795 801 0$bCu-RivES 801 1$bCu-RivES 801 2$bUk-ES 801 2$bCStRLIN 801 2$bWaOLN 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996386229903316 996 $aA politike discourse most excellent for this time present: composed by a French gentleman, against those of the League, which went about to perswade the King to breake the allyance with England, and to confirme it with Spaine$92389887 997 $aUNISA LEADER 04413nam 2200661 a 450 001 9910781544203321 005 20230413231252.0 010 $a1-283-35934-0 010 $a9786613359346 010 $a90-272-8001-0 035 $a(CKB)2550000000073840 035 $a(EBL)805762 035 $a(OCoLC)769342175 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000642801 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11386801 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000642801 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10652706 035 $a(PQKB)11577149 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC805762 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL805762 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10517156 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000073840 100 $a19850226d1984 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$a"Well" in dialogue games $ea discourse analysis of the interjection "well" in idealized conversation /$fLauri Carlson 210 1$aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia :$cJ. Benjamins Pub. Co.,$d1984. 215 $a1 online resource (113 pages) 225 1 $aPragmatics & beyond : an interdisciplinary series of language studies,$x0166-6258 ;$v5:5 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 0 $a90-272-2539-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aWELL IN DIALOGUE GAMES A Discourse Analysis of the Interjection well in Idealized Conversation; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Table of contents; Acknowledgements; 1.INTRODUCTION; 1.1. Aims; 1.2. Idealizations; 1.3. Chapter outlines; 2. THEORY; 2.1. Dialogue games; 2.2. Conversational analysis; 2.3. Computational models of dialogue; 2.3.1. Goal-directedness; 2.3.2. Modeling beliefs; 2.3.3. Current focus of dialogue; 2.3.4. Rules of dialogue shared by participants; 3. EARLIER TREATMENTS OF WELL; 3.1. Lakoff (1973a); 3.2. Murray (1979); 3.3. Svartvik (1980); 3.4. Owen (1981) 327 $a4. THE PRESENT TREATMENT; 4.1. The hypothesis; 4.2. Development of the hypothesis; 4.3. Data and classification; 4.3.1. Criteria pertaining to dialogue structure; 4.3.2. Utility related criteria; 4.3.3. How many meanings?; 5. WELL AS A QUALIFIER; 5.1. Question-answer exchanges; 5.1.1. Dialogue internal qualifications; 5.1.1.1. Defective questions; 5.1.1.2. Defective answers; 5.1.1.3. Demanded explanations; 5.1.2. Dialogue external qualifications; 5.1.2.1. Conversational maxims compromised; 5.1.2.2. Other interests compromised; 5.2. Other exchanges; 5.2.1. Replies; 5.2.2. Arguments 327 $a5.2.3. Corrections; 5.2.4. Comments; 5.2.5. Exclamations; 5.2.6. Topic suggestions; 6. WELL AS A FRAME; 6.1. Opening a dialogue; 6.2. Transition situations; 6.2.1. Preparatory moves; 6.2.2. Topic shift; 6.2.3. Turn taking; 6.3. Closing; 6.4. Turn internal cases; 7. CONTRASTIVE STUDIES; 7.1. Well vs. oh; 7.1.1. (?.oh); 7.1.2. Exclamation; 7.1.3. Replies; 7.1.4. Unexpected topic; 7.1.5. Disappointment; 7.1.6. Topic shift; 7.2. Well and Finnish no; 7.3. Schourup (1983); 7.3.1. Theory and methodology; 7.3.2. Hypothesis; 7.3.3. Exclamations; 7.3.4. Topic shifting; 7.3.5. Answers 327 $a7.3.6. Before questions; 7.3.7. Corrections; 8. EXTENSIONS; 8.1. Politeness; 8.2. Emotions; 8.3. Well in writing; FOOTNOTES; SOURCES OF EXAMPLES; REFERENCES 330 $aThis dialogue game approach to the discourse analysis of the English interjection well aims at the formulation of rules which would be informative (marking some contexts of use as more natural than others), systematic (applicable in a mechanical or at least in a non-ad hoc way), and adequate (showing putative competitors to be either false to fact, too narrow or too wide, or demonstrably equivalent). 410 0$aPragmatics & beyond ;$v5:5. 606 $aWell (The English word) 606 $aEnglish language$xInterjections 606 $aEnglish language$xDiscourse analysis 606 $aEnglish language$xSpoken English 615 0$aWell (The English word) 615 0$aEnglish language$xInterjections. 615 0$aEnglish language$xDiscourse analysis. 615 0$aEnglish language$xSpoken English. 676 $a401/.41 700 $aCarlson$b Lauri$f1952-$01478295 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910781544203321 996 $a"Well" in dialogue games$93693950 997 $aUNINA