LEADER 01400nam  2200361Ia 450 
001 996385716603316
005 20200824132020.0
035   $a(CKB)4940000000078614
035   $a(EEBO)2240994945
035   $a(OCoLC)ocm12713509e
035   $a(OCoLC)12713509
035   $a(EXLCZ)994940000000078614
100   $a19851024d1641      uy             |
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurbn||||a|bb|
200 14$aThe argument of Nicholas Fvller of Grayes Inne esquire, in the case of Tho. Lad and Rich. Mansell his clients$b[electronic resource] $ewherein it is plainly proved, that the ecclesiasticall commissioners have no power by their commission to imprison or to fine any of His Majesties subjects or to put them to the oath ex officio
210   $aLondon $cPrinted for N. Vavasour$d1641
215   $a[4], 32 p
300   $aReproduction of original in Thomason Collection, British Library.
330   $aeebo-0158
606   $aEcclesiastical law$zEngland
607   $aGreat Britain$xReligion$y17th century
615  0$aEcclesiastical law
700   $aFuller$b Nicholas$f1543-1620.$01007971
801  0$bEAA
801  1$bEAA
801  2$bm/c
801  2$bUMI
801  2$bWaOLN
906   $aBOOK
912   $a996385716603316
996   $aThe argument of Nicholas Fvller of Grayes Inne esquire, in the case of Tho. Lad and Rich. Mansell his clients$92392418
997   $aUNISA