LEADER 02253nam  2200421Ia 450 
001 996384463603316
005 20221108090818.0
035   $a(CKB)4940000000073744
035   $a(EEBO)2240870581
035   $a(OCoLC)11817102
035   $a(EXLCZ)994940000000073744
100   $a19850318d1692      uy             |
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurbn||||a|bb|
200 12$aA vindication of the deprived Bishops, asserting their spiritual rights against a lay-deprivation, against the charge of schism, as managed by the late editors of an anonymous Baroccian ms$b[electronic resource] $ein two parts ... to which is subjoined the latter end of the said ms. omitted by the editors, making against them and the cause espoused by them, in Greek and English
210   $aLondon $c[s.n.]$d1692
215   $a104, [2] p
300   $aAttributed to Henry Dodwell. Cf. DNB.
300   $aA reply to Humphry Hody's translation of a Baroccian manuscript in the Bodleian library, which was published under title: The unreasonableness of a separation from the new bishops. Cf. DNB, v. 27, p. 77.
300   $aImperfect: page 2 of "The canons in the Baroccian manuscript" is lacking on film.
300   $aReproduction of original in Cambridge University Library.
327   $aI. Shewing, that through the instances collected in the said ms. had been pertinent to the editors design, yet that would not have been sufficient for obtaining their cause -- II. Shewing, that the instances there collected are indeed not pertinent to the editors design, for vindicating the validity of the deprivation of spiritual power by a lay-authority.
330   $aeebo-0021
606   $aNonjurors$vEarly works to 1800
606   $aBishops$zEngland$vEarly works to 1800
615  0$aNonjurors
615  0$aBishops
700   $aDodwell$b Henry$f1641-1711.$0744120
801  0$bEAA
801  1$bEAA
801  2$bm/c
801  2$bEAA
801  2$bUMI
801  2$bWaOLN
906   $aBOOK
912   $a996384463603316
996   $aA vindication of the deprived Bishops, asserting their spiritual rights against a lay-deprivation, against the charge of schism, as managed by the late editors of an anonymous Baroccian ms$92316781
997   $aUNISA