LEADER 03054 am  22005173u 450 
001 996328047803316
005 20211005200525.0
010   $a3-11-056208-1
010   $a3-11-056410-6
024 7 $a10.1515/9783110564105
035   $a(CKB)4100000010137410
035   $a(OAPEN)1006940
035   $a(DE-B1597)487639
035   $a(OCoLC)1135607187
035   $a(DE-B1597)9783110562088
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5525591
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5525591
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000010137410
100   $a20200406h20192020  fg              
101 0 $aeng
135   $auuuuu---auuuu
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aAspectuality $eAn Onomasiological Model Applied to the Romance Languages /$fSarah Desś Schmid
210  1$aBerlin ;$aBoston :$cDe Gruyter,$d[2019]
210  4$d©2020
215   $a1 online resource (268)
311   $a3-11-056207-3 
327   $tFrontmatter --$tPreface to English Edition --$tPreface --$tContents --$tIntroduction --$t1. The Temporal Structuring of States of Affairs - Tense, Aspect and Aktionsart --$t2. The Aspectual Domain --$t3. Aspectuality as a Complex, Semantic, Universal Category. Theoretical and Methodological Foundations --$t4. The Model of Aspectuality as an Internal Temporal Structuring of States of Affairs --$t5. Combinations of the Dimensions of Aspectuality in the Situation Frame: the First Level of the Model Applied --$t6. The Second Level of the Aspectuality Model Applied --$t7. Closing Remarks --$tAbbreviations --$tReferences --$tAuthor Index
330   $aThis synchronic study presents a new onomasiological, frame-theoretical model for the description, classification and theoretical analysis of the cross-linguistic content category aspectuality. It deals specifically with those pieces of information, which, in their interplay, constitute the aspectual value of states of affairs. The focus is on Romance Languages, although the model can be applied just as well to other languages, in that it is underpinned by a principle grounded in a fundamental cognitive ability: the delimitation principle. Unlike traditional approaches, which generally have a semasiological orientation and strictly adhere to a semantic differentiation between grammatical aspect and lexical aspect (Aktionsart), this study makes no such differentiation and understands these as merely different formal realisations of one and the same content category: aspectuality.
606   $aLinguistics$2bicssc
606   $aSemantics & pragmatics$2bicssc
606   $aGrammar, syntax & morphology$2bicssc
610   $aAspectuality.
610   $aOnomasiology.
615  7$aLinguistics
615  7$aSemantics & pragmatics
615  7$aGrammar, syntax & morphology
700   $aDesś Schmid$b Sarah$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0615420
801  0$bDE-B1597
801  1$bDE-B1597
906   $aBOOK
912   $a996328047803316
996   $aAspectuality$91757503
997   $aUNISA