LEADER 03563nam 2200553 a 450 001 996320824903316 005 20230725030540.0 010 $a0-8330-5115-6 035 $a(CKB)2670000000066642 035 $a(EBL)669771 035 $a(OCoLC)701720062 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000471121 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11299446 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000471121 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10417330 035 $a(PQKB)11762507 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL669771 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10440623 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC669771 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000066642 100 $a20101201d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aManaging spent nuclear fuel$b[electronic resource] $estrategy alternatives and policy implications /$fTom LaTourrette ... [et al.] 210 $aSanta Monica, Calif. $cRAND$d2010 215 $a1 online resource (98 p.) 300 $a"MG-970-RC." 311 $a0-8330-5108-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aCover; Title Page; Copyright; Preface; Contents; Figures; Tables; Untitled; Summary; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Chapter One - Where We Are Now, How We Got Here, and the Decisions We Face; The Current Situation; Historical Background; Confronting the Problem Anew; Objectives and Approach of This Monograph; Chapter Two - Technical Approaches to Spent-Nuclear Fuel Management; On-Site Storage; Spent-Fuel Pools; Dry-Cask Storage; Evaluation of Extended Reliance on On-Site Storage; Centralized Interim Storage; Evaluation of Centralized Interim Storage; Advanced Fuel Cycles; Uranium Resources 327 $aProliferation RiskWaste Management; Evaluation of Advanced Fuel Cycles; Permanent Geological Disposal; Evaluation of Permanent Geological Disposal; Comparison of Technical Approaches; Safety; Security; Technical Obstacles; Public Acceptance; Cost; Chapter Three - Review of Institutional, Statutory, and Regulatory Arrangements; Overview of Current Institutional Framework; Assessment of the Current Framework; Organizational Competence and Capacity; Performance of Decision Processes; Considerations for Moving Forward; Chapter Four - Policy Implications of Alternative Strategies 327 $aExpeditiously Proceed with Yucca MountainDevelop Centralized Interim Storage in Conjunction with Permanent Geological Disposal; Pursue Advanced Fuel Cycles; Maintain Continued On-Site Storage; Implications for Spent-Fuel Management Policy; References; Back Cover 330 $aNuclear power is receiving renewed interest because of its low greenhouse gas emissions. However, if nuclear power is to be sustainable option for the United States, methods for managing spent fuel that meet stringent safety and environmental standards must be implemented. This report examines technical and institutional approaches to spent fuel management and highlights policy implications of pursuing alternative strategies. 606 $aRadioactive waste disposal$xGovernment policy$zUnited States 606 $aSpent reactor fuels$xStorage$xGovernment policy$zUnited States 615 0$aRadioactive waste disposal$xGovernment policy 615 0$aSpent reactor fuels$xStorage$xGovernment policy 676 $a363.72/895610973 701 $aLaTourrette$b Tom$f1963-$0905764 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996320824903316 996 $aManaging spent nuclear fuel$92073775 997 $aUNISA