LEADER 03650nam 2200697 450 001 996308761103316 005 20240109165105.0 010 $a3-486-83558-0 024 7 $a10.1524/9783486835588 035 $a(CKB)2560000000313141 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001575757 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16240200 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001575757 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14850191 035 $a(PQKB)10033718 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3049258 035 $a(DE-B1597)240710 035 $a(OCoLC)1042104855 035 $a(OCoLC)979633611 035 $a(OCoLC)980251428 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783486835588 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/40850 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000313141 100 $a20150130h20042004 uy 0 101 0 $ager 135 $aurcn#|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAndre? Francois-Poncet als botschafter in Berlin (1931-1938) /$fvon Claus W. Scha?fer 210 $cDe Gruyter$d2014 210 1$aMunich, Germany :$cR. Oldenbourg Verlag,$d2004. 210 4$d©2004 215 $a1 online resource (384 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 225 1 $aPariser Historische Studien ;$vBand 64 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a3-486-56844-2 327 $ainhalt -- vorwort -- einleitung -- 1. der weg nach berlin -- 2. die anfänge in berlin -- 3. das ende von weimar -- 4. die anfänge hitlers -- 5. europa am scheideweg -- 6. die ruhe vor dem sturm -- 7. auf dem weg in den krieg -- schluss -- dokumente -- quellen- und literaturverzeichnis -- abkürzungsverzeichnis -- personenregister 330 $aAndré François-Poncet was France's ambassador in Berlin from 1931 to 1938. He not only saw the Weimar Republic fall, but also the Third Reich. The diplomat was confronted with all questions of international politics in the inter-war period: Should Germany issue reparations and allow armaments? How should you react to Chancellor Hitler? Should we seek cooperation or discussion with him? Should his breaches of contract be answered with political and / or economic sanctions or even intervention? The present study shows the different answers André François-Poncet gave to these questions. They were by no means as clear-cut as the ambassador after the Second World War and the previous research would have us believe. André François-Poncet wavered between cooperation and confrontation with Germany until his resignation after the Munich Conference. The study, which brings the first half of the life of the legendary ambassador out of the shadows of history, shows when he pleaded for what and why. 410 0$aPariser historische Studien ;$vBand 64. 606 $aHistory (General) 606 $aHISTORY / General$2bisacsh 607 $aFrance$xForeign relations$zGermany 607 $aGermany$xForeign relations$zFrance 607 $aGermany$xForeign relations$y1918-1933 607 $aGermany$xForeign relations$y1933-1945 607 $aGermany$xHistory$y1918-1933 607 $aGermany$xHistory$y1933-1945 615 0$aHistory (General). 615 7$aHISTORY / General. 676 $a327.2/029 700 $aScha?fer$b Claus W.$0962071 702 $aInstitut Historique Allemand Paris$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bUkMaJRU 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996308761103316 996 $aAndre? Francois-Poncet als botschafter in Berlin (1931-1938)$92181296 997 $aUNISA LEADER 05600nam 22007094a 450 001 9910782790603321 005 20230414184314.0 010 $a1-283-39657-2 010 $a9786613396570 010 $a3-11-019861-4 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110198614 035 $a(CKB)1000000000692151 035 $a(EBL)370758 035 $a(OCoLC)476206323 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000101171 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11109031 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000101171 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10037423 035 $a(PQKB)10219371 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC370758 035 $a(DE-B1597)33869 035 $a(OCoLC)320868200 035 $a(OCoLC)890620280 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110198614 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL370758 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10256575 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL339657 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000692151 100 $a20071115d2008 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||#|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAlignment change in Iranian languages $ea construction grammar approach /$fGeoffrey L.J. Haig 210 1$aNew York :$cMouton de Gruyter,$d2008. 215 $a1 online resource (380 pages) 225 1 $aEmpirical approaches to language typology ;$v37 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 0 $a3-11-019586-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [339]-358) and index. 327 $aIntroduction -- Aims and assumptions -- The Iranian languages -- Alignment in the Iranian context -- Constructions and syntax -- Old Iranian -- The Mana Kartam construction -- Implications for diachronic syntax -- What is a passive? -- Re-assessing the M. K. construction -- The semantics of the genitive -- Summing up the alternatives -- Conclusions -- Western Middle Iranian -- Middle Iranian -- Past transitive constructions -- The case system -- Case and person -- Pronominal clitics -- Clitics expressing core arguments -- Past transitive verbs -- Summary of Middle Iranian -- Case systems in West Iranian -- Introduction -- Three processes -- Innovated object markers -- Inhalt -- The tatic-type languages -- Explanations for change -- Case and animacy -- Towards a solution -- Summary of case -- Kurdish (northern group) -- Introduction -- Overview of the morphosyntax -- The canonical ergative construction -- Deviations from canonical ergativity -- Summary of deviations -- Evidence from Badynany -- Summary of the northern group -- The central group -- Introduction -- Suleimani morphosyntax -- Past transitive constructions -- Aligning case and agreement -- Summary of the central group -- Desire, obligation, possession, and ergativity -- Conclusions -- A brief synopsis -- Areal pressure and alignment change -- Alignment in Indo-European -- On explanations for change -- Appendices -- Case in Old Persian -- Changing rules of clitic placement. 330 $aThe Iranian languages, due to their exceptional time-depth of attestation, constitute one of the very few instances where a shift from accusative alignment to split-ergativity is actually documented. Yet remarkably, within historical syntax, the Iranian case has received only very superficial coverage. This book provides the first in-depth treatment of alignment change in Iranian, from Old Persian (5 C. BC) to the present. The first part of the book examines the claim that ergativity in Middle Iranian emerged from an Old Iranian agented passive construction. This view is rejected in favour of a theory which links the emergence of ergativity to External Possession. Thus the primary mechanisms involved is not reanalysis, but the extension of a pre-existing construction. The notion of Non-Canonical Subjecthood plays a pivotal role, which in the present account is linked to the semantics of what is termed Indirect Participation. In the second part of the book, a comparative look at contemporary West Iranian is undertaken. It can be shown that throughout the subsequent developments in the morphosyntax, distinct components such as agreement, nominal case marking, or the grammar of cliticisation, in fact developed remarkably independently of one another. It was this de-coupling of sub-systems of the morphosyntax that led to the notorious multiplicity of alignment types in Iranian, a fact that also characterises past-tense alignments in the sister branch of Indo-European, Indo-Aryan. Along with data from more than 20 Iranian languages, presented in a manner that renders them accessible to the non-specialist, there is extensive discussion of more general topics such as the adequacy of functional accounts of changes in case systems, discourse pressure and the role of animacy, the notion of drift, and the question of alignment in early Indo-European. 410 0$aEmpirical approaches to language typology ;$v37. 606 $aIranian languages$xVerb 606 $aIranian languages$xErgative constructions 606 $aIranian languages$xTransitivity 606 $aIranian languages$xTense 610 $aConstruction grammar, Iranian, Kurdish. 615 0$aIranian languages$xVerb. 615 0$aIranian languages$xErgative constructions. 615 0$aIranian languages$xTransitivity. 615 0$aIranian languages$xTense. 676 $a491/.5 700 $aHaig$b Geoffrey$01517814 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910782790603321 996 $aAlignment change in Iranian languages$93755051 997 $aUNINA