LEADER 03634nam 2200637Ia 450 001 996248281103316 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-8173-8219-4 035 $a(CKB)1000000000537506 035 $a(EBL)438212 035 $a(OCoLC)427509620 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000360281 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12111100 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000360281 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10317311 035 $a(PQKB)11642903 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000158130 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11164000 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000158130 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10147183 035 $a(PQKB)11698855 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC438212 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse8642 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL438212 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10237166 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000537506 100 $a20030116d2003 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aFree speech on trial$b[electronic resource] $ecommunication perspectives on landmark Supreme Court decisions /$fedited by Richard A. Parker 210 $aTuscaloosa, AL $cUniversity of Alabama Press$dc2003 215 $a1 online resource (356 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-8173-1301-X 311 $a0-8173-5025-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 327 $aIntroduction / Franklyn S. Haiman -- Communication studies and free speech law / Richard A. Parker -- Schenck v. United States and Abrams v. United States / Stephen A. Smith -- Whitney v. California / Juliet Dee -- Stromberg v. California / John S. Gossett -- Near v. Minnesota / John S. Gossett and Juliet Dee -- Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire / Dale Herbeck -- West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette / Warren Sandmann -- New York Times v. Sullivan / Nicholas F. Burnett -- United States v. O'Brien / Donald A. Fishman -- Brandenburg v. Ohio / Richard A. Parker -- Cohen v. California / Susan J. Balter-Reitz -- Kleindienst v. Mandel / Mary Elizabeth Bezanson -- Miller v. California / Joseph Tuman -- Buckley v. Valeo / Craig R. Smith -- FCC v. Pacifica Foundation / R. Wilfred Tremblay -- Central Hudson Gas & Electric v. Public Service Commission / Joseph J. Hemmer Jr. -- Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier / Andrew H. Utterback -- Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell / Edward C. Brewer -- Texas v. Johnson / David J. Vergobbi -- Reno v. ACLU / Douglas Fraleigh -- Conclusion / Ann M. Gill. 330 $a Describes landmark free speech decisions of the Supreme Court while highlighting the issues of language, rhetoric, and communication that underlie them. At the intersection of communication and First Amendment law reside two significant questions: What is the speech we ought to protect, and why should we protect it? The 20 scholars of legal communication whose essays are gathered in this volume propose various answers to these questions, but their essays share an abiding concern with a constitutional guarantee of free speech and its symbiotic relationship with commu 606 $aCivil rights$zUnited States$vCases 606 $aFreedom of speech$zUnited States$vCases 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aCivil rights 615 0$aFreedom of speech 676 $a342.73/0853 676 $a342.730853 701 $aParker$b Richard A$g(Richard Anthony),$f1945-$01016551 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996248281103316 996 $aFree speech on trial$92379004 997 $aUNISA LEADER 01002oam 2200265z- 450 001 996279729803316 005 20240421164827.0 010 $a1-5090-8715-X 035 $a(CKB)1000000000331746 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000331746 100 $a20210316c2007uuuu -u- - 101 0 $aeng 200 10$a2007 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Methods for Uncertainty Estimation in Measurement $e16-18 July 2007, Sardagna, [Trento], Italy 311 $a1-4244-0932-2 311 $a1-4244-0933-0 606 $aMeasurement uncertainty (Statistics)$vCongresses 606 $aUncertainty (Information theory)$vCongresses 615 0$aMeasurement uncertainty (Statistics) 615 0$aUncertainty (Information theory) 676 $a620/.0044 712 02$aInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. 906 $aPROCEEDING 912 $a996279729803316 996 $a2007 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Methods for Uncertainty Estimation in Measurement$92871942 997 $aUNISA