LEADER 03341nam 22005652 450 001 996248029403316 005 20230320225829.0 010 $a0-511-99511-3 010 $a0-511-62283-X 024 7 $a2027/heb05510 035 $a(CKB)3400000000085004 035 $a(dli)HEB05510 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4639584 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511622830 035 $a(MiU)MIU01000000000000011386542 035 $a(PPN)261368397 035 $a(EXLCZ)993400000000085004 100 $a20141103d1979|||| uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe post-Darwinian controversies $ea study of the Protestant struggle to come to terms with Darwin in Great Britain and America, 1870-1900 /$fJames R. Moore 205 $aFirst paperback edition. 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d1979. 215 $a1 online resource (xi, 502 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 0 $a0-521-21989-2 311 0 $a0-521-28517-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $apt. 1. Historians and historiography -- pt. 2. Darwinism and evolutionary thought -- pt. 3. Theology and evolution. 330 $aThe Post-Darwinian Controversies offers an original interpretation of Protestant responses to Darwin after 1870, viewing them in a transatlantic perspective and as a constitutive part of the history of post-Darwinian evolutionary thought. The impact of evolutionary theory on the religious consciousness of the nineteenth century has commonly been seen in terms of a 'conflict' or 'warfare' between science and theology. Dr. Moore's account begins by discussing the polemical origins and baneful effects of the 'military metaphor', and this leads to a revised view of the controversies based on an analysis of the underlying intellectual struggle to come to terms with Darwin. The middle section of the book distinguishes the 'Darwinism' of Darwin himself amid the main currents of post-Darwinian evolutionary thought, and is followed by chapters which examine the responses to Darwin of twenty-eight Christian controversialists, tracing the philosophical and theological lineage of their views. The paradox that emerges - that Darwin's theory was accepted in substance only by those whose theology was distinctly orthodox theology and of other evolutionary theories with liberal and romantic theological speculation. 410 0$aACLS Humanities E-Book. 606 $aEvolution$xReligious aspects$xChristianity 606 $aProtestant churches$zGreat Britain$xDoctrines$xHistory 606 $aProtestant churches$zUnited States$xDoctrines$xHistory 606 $aTheology, Doctrinal$xHistory$y19th century 615 0$aEvolution$xReligious aspects$xChristianity. 615 0$aProtestant churches$xDoctrines$xHistory. 615 0$aProtestant churches$xDoctrines$xHistory. 615 0$aTheology, Doctrinal$xHistory 676 $a213 700 $aMoore$b James R$g(James Richard),$f1947-$01011430 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996248029403316 996 $aThe post-Darwinian controversies$92343207 997 $aUNISA