LEADER 03807 am 22006133u 450 001 996217064403316 005 20230725040445.0 010 $a1-921666-31-5 035 $a(CKB)3170000000065268 035 $a(EBL)4653416 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000671431 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12347206 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000671431 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10624689 035 $a(PQKB)11251394 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4653416 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/26737 035 $a(EXLCZ)993170000000065268 100 $a20160905h20102010 fy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn#---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe ayes have it$b[electronic resource] $ethe history of the Queensland Parliament, 1957-1989 /$fJohn Wanna and Tracy Arklay 210 $aCanberra$cANU Press$d2010 210 1$aCanberra, Australian Capital Territory :$cThe Australian National University,$d2010. 210 4$dİ2010 215 $a1 online resource (x, 745 pages) $cillustrations; digital, PDF file(s) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-921666-30-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 330 $a?The Ayes Have It? is a fascinating account of the Queensland Parliament during three decades of high-drama politics. It examines in detail the Queensland Parliament from the days of the ?Labor split? in the 1950s, through the conservative governments of Frank Nicklin, John Bjelke- Petersen and Mike Ahern, to the fall of the Nationals government led briefly by Russell Cooper in December 1989. The volume traces the rough and tumble of parliamentary politics in the frontier state. The authors focus on parliament as a political forum, on the representatives and personalities that made up the institution over this period, on the priorities and political agendas that were pursued, and the increasingly contentious practices used to control parliamentary proceedings. Throughout the entire history are woven other controversies that repeatedly recur ? controversies over state economic development, the provision of government services, industrial disputation and government reactions, electoral zoning and disputes over malapportionment, the impost of taxation in the ?low tax state?, encroachments on civil liberties and political protests, the perennial topic of censorship, as well as the emerging issues of integrity, concerns about conflicts of interest and the slide towards corruption. There are fights with the federal government ? especially with the Whitlam government ? and internal fights within the governing coalition which eventually leads to its collapse in 1983, after which the Nationals manage to govern alone for two very tumultuous terms. On the non-government side, the bitterness of the 1950s split was reflected in the early parliaments of this period, and while the Australian Labor Party eventually saw off its rivalrous off-shoot (the QLP-DLP) it then began to implode through waves of internal factional discord. 606 $aPolitics & government$2bicssc 607 $aQueensland$xPolitics and government 610 $aaustralia 610 $apolitics 610 $ahistory 610 $aparliament 610 $aJoh Bjelke-Petersen 610 $aNational Party of Australia 610 $aQueensland 615 7$aPolitics & government 676 $a328.9430922 700 $aWanna$b John$0282039 702 $aArklay$b Tracey 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bUkMaJRU 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996217064403316 996 $aThe ayes have it$91927816 997 $aUNISA LEADER 05321nam 2200817 450 001 9910827477203321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-231-50107-2 024 7 $a10.7312/mcco12616 035 $a(CKB)111056485391316 035 $a(MH)008940065-8 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000101552 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11998832 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000101552 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10042231 035 $a(PQKB)11744512 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5275834 035 $a(DE-B1597)459112 035 $a(OCoLC)51566945 035 $a(OCoLC)979953746 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780231501071 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5275834 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11529431 035 $a(EXLCZ)99111056485391316 100 $a20180403h20022002 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aAlterations of state $esacred kingship in the English Reformation /$fRichard C. McCoy 210 1$aNew York :$cColumbia University Press,$d2002. 210 4$dİ2002 215 $a1 online resource (xxiv, 218 p. )$cill. ; 300 $aIncludes index. 311 $a0-231-12616-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tPreface -- $tAcknowledgments -- $tIllustrations -- $t1. Real Presence to Royal Presence -- $t2. Sacred Space: John Skelton and Westminster's Royal Sepulcher -- $t3. Rites of Memory: Shakespeare and the Elizabethan Compromise -- $t4. Idolizing Kings: John Milton and Stuart Rule -- $t5. Sacramental to Sentimental: Andrew Marvell and the Restoration -- $tNotes -- $tIndex 330 $aTraditional notions of sacred kingship became both more grandiose and more problematic during England's turbulent sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The reformation launched by Henry VIII and his claims for royal supremacy and divine right rule led to the suppression of the Mass, as the host and crucifix were overshadowed by royal iconography and pageantry. These changes began a religious controversy in England that would lead to civil war, regicide, restoration, and ultimately revolution. Richard McCoy shows that, amid these sometimes cataclysmic Alterations of State, writers like John Skelton, Shakespeare, John Milton, and Andrew Marvell grappled with the idea of kingship and its symbolic and substantive power. Their artistic representations of the crown reveal the passion and ambivalence with which the English viewed their royal leaders. While these writers differed on the fundamental questions of the day-Skelton was a staunch defender of the English monarchy and traditional religion, Milton was a radical opponent of both, and Shakespeare and Marvell were more equivocal-they shared an abiding fascination with the royal presence or, sometimes more tellingly, the royal absence. Ranging from regicides real and imagined-with the very real specter of the slain King Charles I haunting the country like a revenant of the king's ghost in Shakespeare's Hamlet-from the royal sepulcher at Westminster Abbey to Peter Paul Reubens's Apotheosis of King James at Whitehall, and from the Elizabethan compromise to the Glorious Revolution, McCoy plumbs the depths of English attitudes toward the king, the state, and the very idea of holiness. He reveals how older notions of sacred kingship expanded during the political and religious crises that transformed the English nation, and helps us understand why the conflicting emotions engendered by this expansion have proven so persistent. 606 $aKings and rulers$xReligious aspects$xChristianity 606 $aEnglish literature$yEarly modern, 1500-1700$xHistory and criticism 606 $aKings and rulers in literature 606 $aChristianity and literature$zGreat Britain$xHistory$y16th century 606 $aChristianity and literature$zGreat Britain$xHistory$y17th century 606 $aPolitics and literature$zGreat Britain$xHistory$y16th century 606 $aPolitics and literature$zGreat Britain$xHistory$y17th century 606 $aMonarchy in literature 606 $aHoly, The, in literature 606 $aState, The, in literature 606 $aChurch and state in literature 615 0$aKings and rulers$xReligious aspects$xChristianity. 615 0$aEnglish literature$xHistory and criticism. 615 0$aKings and rulers in literature. 615 0$aChristianity and literature$xHistory 615 0$aChristianity and literature$xHistory 615 0$aPolitics and literature$xHistory 615 0$aPolitics and literature$xHistory 615 0$aMonarchy in literature. 615 0$aHoly, The, in literature. 615 0$aState, The, in literature. 615 0$aChurch and state in literature. 676 $a820.9352351 700 $aMcCoy$b Richard C.$f1946-$01681928 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910827477203321 996 $aAlterations of state$94051675 997 $aUNINA 999 $aThis Record contains information from the Harvard Library Bibliographic Dataset, which is provided by the Harvard Library under its Bibliographic Dataset Use Terms and includes data made available by, among others the Library of Congress