LEADER 02182oam  2200577zu 450 
001 996211425103316
005 20230421042325.0
010   $a1-280-56082-7
010   $a9786610560820
010   $a3-527-60220-8
035   $a(CKB)1000000000019213
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000298009
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11239296
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000298009
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10343322
035   $a(PQKB)10761240
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4956750
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4956750
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL56082
035   $a(OCoLC)824553932
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000019213
100   $a20160829d1993      uy              
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aGuardians of science : fairness and reliability of peer review
210 31$a[Place of publication not identified]$cVCH$d1993
215   $a1 online resource (123 pages)
300   $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
311   $a3-527-29041-9 
330   $aAn analysis of one of the most controversial issues of modern scientific culture: peer review has been the subject matter of many articles in newspapers and general interest scientific and news magazines. This book considers the necessity of having a reliable method of separating the wheat from the chaff in science, in the light of the large number of recent cases of fraud in science.
606   $aResearch$xEvaluation$xAnalysis
606   $aPeer review$xAnalysis
606   $aTechnical writing$xAnalysis$xEvaluation
606   $aSciences - General$2HILCC
606   $aPhysical Sciences & Mathematics$2HILCC
615  0$aResearch$xEvaluation$xAnalysis
615  0$aPeer review$xAnalysis
615  0$aTechnical writing$xAnalysis$xEvaluation
615  7$aSciences - General
615  7$aPhysical Sciences & Mathematics
676   $a507/.2
700   $aDaniel$b Hans-Dieter$0978949
702   $aRussey$b William E
801  0$bPQKB
906   $aBOOK
912   $a996211425103316
996   $aGuardians of science : fairness and reliability of peer review$92231462
997   $aUNISA