LEADER 00909nam--2200349---450- 001 990003612130203316 005 20120118095351.0 010 $a3-7705-4073-5 035 $a000361213 035 $aUSA01000361213 035 $a(ALEPH)000361213USA01 035 $a000361213 100 $a20120118d2005----km-y0itay50------ba 101 $ager 102 $aDE 105 $a||||||||001yy 200 1 $a<> Nuance$eKunstgriff und Denkfigur$fWolfgang Lange 210 $aMünchen$cW. Fink$d2005 215 $a282 p.$d24 cm 410 0$12001 454 1$12001 461 1$1001-------$12001 606 0 $aLetteratura tedesca$xStudi 700 1$aLANGE,$bWolfgang$0155995 801 0$aIT$bsalbc$gISBD 912 $a990003612130203316 951 $aII.3.B.502$b556 DIPSUM 959 $aBK 969 $aDSLL 979 $aDSLL$b90$c20120118$lUSA01$h0953 996 $aNuance$91137399 997 $aUNISA LEADER 01010nam0-2200325---450 001 990008533100403321 005 20240126124157.0 010 $a978-88-359-5926-7 035 $a000853310 035 $aFED01000853310 035 $a(Aleph)000853310FED01 100 $a20070627d2007----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $ay-------001yy 200 1 $a<>pensiero che prova$eil destino nella riflessione filosofica di fine settecento in Germania$e(Herder, Schelling, Hölderlin, Hegel)$fAntonio Carrano 210 $aRoma$cEd. Riuniti$d2007 215 $a244 p.$d21 cm 225 1 $aUniversity press$iFilosofia 610 0 $aFilosofia$aGermania 676 $a193$v21$zita 700 1$aCarrano,$bAntonio$0144525 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990008533100403321 952 $aP.1 SF 461$bBibl. 56021$fFLFBC 952 $aDFT A91.2 CARA 01$b2023/2154$fFLFBC 959 $aFLFBC 996 $aPensiero che prova$9733850 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04282nam 2200805 a 450 001 9910822370503321 005 20221026230609.0 010 $a0-8122-4360-9 010 $a1-283-89109-3 010 $a0-8122-0514-6 024 7 $a10.9783/9780812205145 035 $a(CKB)3240000000064735 035 $a(EBL)3441948 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000811104 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12349461 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000811104 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10847424 035 $a(PQKB)10620783 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000631073 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11392503 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000631073 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10590373 035 $a(PQKB)10831335 035 $a(DE-B1597)449476 035 $a(OCoLC)793012601 035 $a(OCoLC)979580920 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780812205145 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3441948 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10642700 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL420359 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3441948 035 $a(EXLCZ)993240000000064735 100 $a20110621d2011 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aHuman rights in our own backyard $einjustice and resistance in the United States /$fedited by William T. Armaline, Davita Silfen Glasberg, and Bandana Purkayastha 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aPhiladelphia $cUniversity of Pennsylvania Press$dc2011 215 $a1 online resource (344 p.) 225 0 $aPennsylvania Studies in Human Rights 225 0$aPennsylvania studies in human rights 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-8122-2257-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $apt. I. Economic rights -- pt. II. Social rights -- pt. III. Cultural rights -- pt. IV. Political and civil rights -- pt. V. Convention on the elimination of all forms of racial discrimination -- pt. VI. Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women -- pt. VII. Human rights and resistance in the United States. 330 $aMost Americans assume that the United States provides a gold standard for human rights-a 2007 survey found that 80 percent of U.S. adults believed that "the U.S. does a better job than most countries when it comes to protecting human rights." As well, discussions among scholars and public officials in the United States frame human rights issues as concerning people, policies, or practices "over there." By contrast, the contributors to this volume argue that many of the greatest immediate and structural threats to human rights, and some of the most significant efforts to realize human rights in practice, can be found in our own backyard.Human Rights in Our Own Backyard examines the state of human rights and responses to human rights issues, drawing on sociological literature and perspectives to interrogate assumptions of American exceptionalism. How do people in the U.S. address human rights issues? What strategies have they adopted, and how successful have these strategies been? Essays are organized around key conventions of human rights, focusing on the relationships between human rights and justice, the state and the individual, civil rights and human rights, and group rights versus individual rights. The contributors are united by a common conception of the human rights enterprise as a process involving not only state-defined and implemented rights but also human rights from below as promoted by activists. 410 0$aPennsylvania Studies in Human Rights 606 $aHuman rights$zUnited States 606 $aHuman rights$xGovernment policy$zUnited States 606 $aJustice 610 $aHuman Rights. 610 $aLaw. 610 $aPolitical Science. 615 0$aHuman rights 615 0$aHuman rights$xGovernment policy 615 0$aJustice. 676 $a323.0973 701 $aArmaline$b William T$01192043 701 $aGlasberg$b Davita Silfen$01192044 701 $aPurkayastha$b Bandana$f1956-$01636152 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910822370503321 996 $aHuman rights in our own backyard$94059533 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04970nam 2200613 a 450 001 9910483666303321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a3-540-35843-9 024 7 $a10.1007/11786849 035 $a(CKB)1000000000233040 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000317162 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11244124 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000317162 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10286451 035 $a(PQKB)11493898 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-540-35843-5 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3068071 035 $a(PPN)123136431 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000233040 100 $a20060606d2006 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn#008mamaa 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aDeontic logic and artificial normative systems $e8th International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, DEON 2006, Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 12-14, 2006 : proceedings /$fLou Goble, John-Jules Ch. Meyer (eds.) 205 $a1st ed. 2006. 210 $aBerlin ;$aNew York $cSpringer$dc2006 215 $a1 online resource (X, 278 p.) 225 1 $aLNCS sublibrary. SL 7, Artificial intelligence 225 1 $aLecture notes in computer science. |p Lecture notes in artificial intelligence,$x0302-9743 ;$v4048 300 $aEarlier conferences have title: Deontic logic, agency, and normative systems. 311 $a3-540-35842-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aAbstracts of Invited Papers -- Roles, Counts-as and Deontic and Action Logics -- Norms and Electronic Institutions -- Emotion Models for Situated Normative Systems? -- Contributed Papers -- Addressing Moral Problems Through Practical Reasoning -- A Logical Architecture of a Normative System -- Delegation of Power in Normative Multiagent Systems -- Strategic Deontic Temporal Logic as a Reduction to ATL, with an Application to Chisholm?s Scenario -- Acting with an End in Sight -- A State/Event Temporal Deontic Logic -- Speech Acts with Institutional Effects in Agent Societies -- Counts-as: Classification or Constitution? An Answer Using Modal Logic -- Don?t Ever Do That! Long-Term Duties in PD e L -- On the Normative Aspect of Signalling Conventions -- Permissions and Uncontrollable Propositions in DSDL3: Non-monotonicity and Algorithms -- Conflicting Obligations in Multi-agent Deontic Logic -- Intermediate Concepts in Normative Systems -- Propositional Quantifiers in Deontic Logic -- A Question of Trust: Assessing the Fulfillment of Commitments in Terms of Strategies -- The Deontic Component of Action Language -- A Complete and Decidable Axiomatisation for Deontic Interpreted Systems -- Sequences, Obligations, and the Contrary-to-Duty Paradox. 330 $aThis volume presents the papers contributed to DEON 2006, the 8th International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, held in Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 12?14, 2006. These biennial DEON (more properly, ?EON) workshops are designed to promote international cooperation among scholars across disciplines who are interested in deontic logic and its use in computer science. They support research that links the formal-logical study of normative concepts and normative systems with computer science, artificial intelligence, philosophy, organization theory, and law. Papers for these workshops might address such general themes as the development of formal systems of deontic logic and related areas of logic, such as logics of action and agency, or the formal analysis of all sorts of normative concepts, such as the notions of rule, role, regulation, authority, power, rights, responsibility, etc. , or the formal representation of legal knowledge. They might also be more concerned with applications, such as the formal specification of systems for the management of bureaucratic processes in public or private administration, or the specification of database integrity constraints or computer security protocols, and more. Of particular interest is the interaction between computer systems and their users. (The DEON 2006 website, http://www. cs. uu. nl/deon2006/,contains links to previous workshops and their papers. This history reveals a vibrant interdisciplinary research program. 410 0$aLecture notes in computer science.$pLecture notes in artificial intelligence ;$v4048. 410 0$aLNCS sublibrary.$nSL 7,$pArtificial intelligence. 517 3 $aDEON 2006 606 $aComputer science$vCongresses 606 $aDeontic logic$vCongresses 615 0$aComputer science 615 0$aDeontic logic 676 $a004.015113 701 $aGoble$b Lou$01751964 701 $aMeyer$b John-Jules Ch$01750123 712 12$aInternational Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910483666303321 996 $aDeontic logic and artificial normative systems$94194629 997 $aUNINA