LEADER 00951nam0-22003011i-450- 001 990003949240403321 005 20130710103542.0 010 $a88-14-10124-8 035 $a000394924 035 $aFED01000394924 035 $a(Aleph)000394924FED01 035 $a000394924 100 $a20030910d2002----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 102 $aIT 200 1 $a<>nuova legge sull'immigrazione$ecommento alla L. n. 189 del 30 luglio 2002 e al D.L. n. 195 del 9 settembre 2002$fa cura di Umberto De Augustinis ... [et al.] 210 $aMilano$cGiuffrè$dstampa 2002 215 $aVI, 192 p.$d24 cm 225 1 $aQuaderni di Diritto & giustizia 702 1$aDe Augustinis,$bUmberto 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990003949240403321 952 $aDP XXXVIII/352$b20633$fDEC 952 $aDPR13C/418$b20742$fDEC 959 $aDEC 996 $aNuova legge sull'immigrazione$9253113 997 $aUNINA LEADER 01300nam0-2200409---450- 001 990000861570203316 005 20080708102428.0 035 $a0086157 035 $aUSA010086157 035 $a(ALEPH)000086157USA01 035 $a0086157 100 $a20020110d1992----km-y0ITAy01------ba 101 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $a||||||||001yy 200 1 $a<> fotografia di moda tra immagine e rappresentazione$fGabriella Rodriguez, Nicola Scontrino 210 $aSalerno$cElea press$d1992 215 $a142 p$cill.$d30 cm 606 0 $aModa$xFotografia$xStoria 676 $a779.9391 700 1$aRODRIGUEZ,$bGabriella$0551238 701 1$aSCONTRINO,$bNicola$0176019 801 0$aIT$bsalbc$gISBD 912 $a990000861570203316 951 $aXIII.5. 68(VII F 113)$b111230 LM$cVII F 951 $aXIII.5. 68a(VII F 113 BIS)$b111231 LM$cVII F 951 $aXIII.5. 68b(VII F 113 A)$b111232 LM$cVII F 959 $aBK 969 $aUMA 969 $aDBC 979 $aPATTY$b90$c20020110$lUSA01$h1100 979 $c20020403$lUSA01$h1731 979 $aPATRY$b90$c20040406$lUSA01$h1659 979 $aCOPAT5$b90$c20060120$lUSA01$h1414 979 $aDBC$b90$c20080708$lUSA01$h1024 996 $aFotografia di moda tra immagine e rappresentazione$9968700 997 $aUNISA LEADER 01825nam 2200361Ia 450 001 996386605103316 005 20200824132243.0 035 $a(CKB)4940000000077814 035 $a(EEBO)2240946641 035 $a(OCoLC)ocm12576699e 035 $a(OCoLC)12576699 035 $a(EXLCZ)994940000000077814 100 $a19850919d1692 uy | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||a|bb| 200 03$aAn argument proving, that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the English government, and prescribed by it$b[electronic resource] $ein opposition to all the false and treacherous hypotheses, of usurpation, conquest, desertion, and of taking the powers that are upon content /$fby Samuel Johnson 210 $aLondon $cPrinted for the author$d1692 215 $a52, [i.e. 62], [1] p 300 $aReproduction of original in Bodleian Library. 300 $aAdvertisement: p. [1] at end. 330 $aeebo-0014 607 $aGreat Britain$xHistory$yJames II, 1685-1688$vPamphlets 607 $aGreat Britain$xHistory$yWilliam and Mary, 1689-1702$vPamphlets 607 $aGreat Britain$xKings and rulers$xSuccession 700 $aJohnson$b Samuel$f1649-1703.$01001074 801 0$bEAA 801 1$bEAA 801 2$bm/c 801 2$bWaOLN 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996386605103316 996 $aAn argument proving, that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the English government, and prescribed by it$92407082 997 $aUNISA