LEADER 00853nam0 2200265 450 001 000020551 005 20081216093723.0 100 $a20081212d1965----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aeng 102 $aUS 105 $ay-------001yy 200 1 $aCalculus of several variables$fby Casper Goffmann 210 $aNew York [etc.]$cHarper & Row$d1965 215 $aIX, 182 p.$d24 cm 225 2 $a<>Harper international student reprint 410 0$12001$a<>Harper international student reprint 500 10$aCalculus of several variables$947528 610 1 $aVariabili 676 $a515.7$v19$9Analisi funzionale 700 1$aGoffman,$bCasper$061898 801 0$aIT$bUNIPARTHENOPE$c20081212$gRICA$2UNIMARC 912 $a000020551 951 $aG 515.7 /3$bG 528$cDSA$d2008 996 $aCalculus of several variables$947528 997 $aUNIPARTHENOPE LEADER 01006nam a2200265 i 4500 001 991003249399707536 005 20020503185444.0 008 940302s1972 us ||| | eng 020 $a0262220156 035 $ab1047917x-39ule_inst 035 $aEXGIL117679$9ExL 040 $aBiblioteca Interfacoltà$bita 100 1 $aVenturi, Robert$023421 245 10$aLearning from Las Vegas /$cRobert Venturi, Denise Scott Brown, Steven Izenour 260 $aCambridge [etc.] :$bMit,$c[1972] 300 $a188 p. :$bill. ;$c37 cm. 650 4$aArchitettura - Las Vegas 700 1 $aIzenour, Steven 700 1 $aScott Brown, Denise$eauthor$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$038227 907 $a.b1047917x$b02-04-14$c27-06-02 912 $a991003249399707536 945 $aLE002 Fondo Brown 1$g1$iLE002-5954N$lle002$o-$pE0.00$q-$rn$so $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i10553204$z27-06-02 996 $aLearning from Las Vegas$91446047 997 $aUNISALENTO 998 $ale002$b01-01-94$cm$da $e-$feng$gus $h0$i1 LEADER 05978nam 2201213 450 001 9910816916203321 005 20230629171856.0 010 $a0-691-16262-X 010 $a1-4008-5266-8 024 7 $a10.1515/9781400852666 035 $a(CKB)2670000000572419 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001368176 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12508227 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001368176 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11445542 035 $a(PQKB)11183666 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0001755601 035 $a(OCoLC)893909903 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse43211 035 $a(DE-B1597)454042 035 $a(OCoLC)984545576 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781400852666 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1753617 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10960637 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL653542 035 $a(OCoLC)894169662 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1753617 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000572419 100 $a20141107h20152015 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe impression of influence $elegislator communication, representation, and democratic accountability /$fJustin Grimmer, Sean J. Westwood, and Solomon Messing 205 $aPilot project. eBook available to selected US libraries only 210 1$aPrinceton, New Jersey ;$aOxfordshire, England :$cPrinceton University Press,$d2015. 210 4$d©2015 215 $a1 online resource (221 pages) $cillustrations, tables 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a1-322-22262-2 311 $a0-691-16261-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tList of Illustrations -- $tList of Tables -- $tAcknowledgments -- $t1. Representation, Spending, and the Personal Vote -- $t2. Solving the Representative's Problem and Creating the Representative's Opportunity -- $t3. How Legislators Create an Impression of Influence -- $t4. Creating an Impression, Not Just Increasing Name Recognition -- $t5. Cultivating an Impression of Influence with Actions and Small Expenditures -- $t6. Credit, Deception, and Institutional Design -- $t7. Criticism and Credit: How Deficit Implications Undermine Credit Allocation -- $t8. Representation and the Impression of Influence -- $t9. Text as Data: Methods Appendix -- $tBibliography -- $tIndex 330 $aConstituents often fail to hold their representatives accountable for federal spending decisions-even though those very choices have a pervasive influence on American life. Why does this happen? Breaking new ground in the study of representation, The Impression of Influence demonstrates how legislators skillfully inform constituents with strategic communication and how this facilitates or undermines accountability. Using a massive collection of Congressional texts and innovative experiments and methods, the book shows how legislators create an impression of influence through credit claiming messages.Anticipating constituents' reactions, legislators claim credit for programs that elicit a positive response, making constituents believe their legislator is effectively representing their district. This spurs legislators to create and defend projects popular with their constituents. Yet legislators claim credit for much more-they announce projects long before they begin, deceptively imply they deserve credit for expenditures they had little role in securing, and boast about minuscule projects. Unfortunately, legislators get away with seeking credit broadly because constituents evaluate the actions that are reported, rather than the size of the expenditures.The Impression of Influence raises critical questions about how citizens hold their political representatives accountable and when deception is allowable in a democracy. 606 $aLegislators$zUnited States$xPublic opinion 606 $aGovernment spending policy$zUnited States$xPublic opinion 606 $aCommunication in politics$zUnited States 610 $aObama administration. 610 $aRepublican activists. 610 $aTea Party movement. 610 $aText as Data. 610 $aaccountability. 610 $aantispending rhetoric. 610 $aappropriations process. 610 $abudget criticism. 610 $abureaucrats. 610 $acongressional credit claiming. 610 $acredit allocation. 610 $acredit claiming messages. 610 $acredit claiming. 610 $acredit-claiming messages. 610 $acredit-claiming rates. 610 $acredit-claiming strategies. 610 $acredit. 610 $adeception. 610 $ademocracy. 610 $ademocratic competence. 610 $aexpenditure. 610 $afederal expenditures. 610 $afederal funds. 610 $afederal spending. 610 $agovernment spending. 610 $agrant decisions. 610 $ahand-coded documents. 610 $ahand-coded labels. 610 $ainfluence. 610 $alegislators. 610 $alinguistic deception. 610 $aname recognition. 610 $anonpartisan reputation. 610 $aparticularistic projects. 610 $apartisan reputation. 610 $apersonal vote. 610 $apolitical representation. 610 $apress releases. 610 $aspending. 610 $astatistical modeling. 610 $asystematic deception. 610 $atransparent communication. 615 0$aLegislators$xPublic opinion. 615 0$aGovernment spending policy$xPublic opinion. 615 0$aCommunication in politics 676 $a328.73 700 $aGrimmer$b Justin$01685949 702 $aWestwood$b Sean J. 702 $aMessing$b Solomon 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910816916203321 996 $aThe impression of influence$94058506 997 $aUNINA