LEADER 00783nam0 2200241 450 001 000016787 005 20181218144224.0 100 $a20081001d1953----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $afre 102 $aFR 105 $ay-------001yy 200 1 $aDu crédit confirmé en matière documentaire$fpar Georges Marais 205 $a2e éd. revue et mise a jour 210 $aParis$cLibrairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence$d1953 215 $a159 p.$d23 cm 610 1 $aCredito documentario$aDiritto francese 676 $a347.735$v19 700 1$aMarais,$bGeorges$0109109 801 0$aIT$bUNIPARTHENOPE$c20081001$gRICA$2UNIMARC 912 $a000016787 951 $a347.735/100$b13875$cNAVA4$d2008 996 $aDu crèdit confirmè en matière documentaire$9582682 997 $aUNIPARTHENOPE LEADER 00848nam 22003253 450 001 9910171034903321 005 20170810175433.0 010 $a88-420-5794-0 035 $a(CKB)3400000000017234 035 $a(ItFiC)it 02414602 035 $a(EXLCZ)993400000000017234 100 $a20101102d1999 uy 0 101 0 $aita 200 13$aIl lavoro editoriale /$fDario Moretti 210 $aRoma [etc.] $cGLF editori Laterza$d1999 215 $a95 p. ;$d18 cm 225 0$aAlfabeto letterario ;$v10 311 $a8842059740 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 676 $a070 676 $a002 676 $a808 676 $a686 700 $aMoretti$b Dario$0254019 801 0$bItFiC 801 1$bItFiC 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910171034903321 996 $aLavoro editoriale$9213700 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04978nam 22006255 450 001 9910522917003321 005 20240307122354.0 010 $a9783030845544 010 $a3030845540 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-84554-4 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6825140 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL6825140 035 $a(CKB)20106382600041 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-84554-4 035 $a(EXLCZ)9920106382600041 100 $a20211210d2022 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aPublic Preferences and Institutional Designs $eIsrael and Turkey Compared /$fby Niva Golan-Nadir 205 $a1st ed. 2022. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2022. 215 $a1 online resource (282 pages) 311 08$aPrint version: Golan-Nadir, Niva Public Preferences and Institutional Designs Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2022 9783030845537 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $a1. Enduring Gaps between Public Preferences and Institutional Designs -- 2. Conceptualizing Enduring Gaps between Public Preferences and Institutional Designs -- 3. Researching Enduring Gaps in Comparative Research: The Data, the Methods, and the Cases -- 4. The Israeli Case: Israel's Formation of Religious State Institutions -- 5. The Israeli Case: The Lack of Societal Pressure to Modify the Religious Marriage Policy -- 6. The Israeli Case: The Use of Institutional Pressure Relief Valves -- 7. The Turkish Case-Turkey's Formation of Secular State Institutions -- 8. The Turkish Case: The Lack of Societal Pressure to Modify Secular Marriage Policy -- 9. The Turkish Case-The Use of Institutional Pressure Relief Valves -- 10. Conclusion. 330 $a'A fascinating comparison of two countries that maintain marriage policies only a minority of the population prefers... Golan-Nadir offers a provocative account with implications for how policies are designed and maintained in democracies.' -Margaret Levi, Professor of Political Science, Stanford University 'Social scientists interested in institutional development, the interplay between law and politics, and public administration will benefit from reading this original work.' -John V.C. Nye, Professor of Economics and Bastiat Chair in Political Economy, George Mason University 'In her analysis of marriage regulation in Turkey and Israel, Niva Golan-Nadir goes beyond existing accounts of state responsiveness gaps and charts new territory by revealing the institutional politics of why states do not meet their citizens' needs. Public Preferences and Institutional Designs is a must read for everyone interested in the complex relationship between state and religion.' -Fritz Sager, Professor of Political Science, University of Bern This book explores the existence of gaps between public preferences and institutional designs in democracies, specifically in cases in which such gaps are maintained for a long period of time without being challenged by the electorate. Gaps such as these can be seen in the complex relations between the state and religion in Israel and Turkey, and more specifically in their policies on marriage. This line of investigation is interesting both theoretically and empirically, as despite their differing policies both Israel and Turkey share a similar pattern of institutional dynamics. Existing explanations for this phenomenon suggest either civil society-based arguments or intra-institutional dynamics as reasons for the maintenance of such gaps. This book enriches our understanding of policy dynamics in democratic systems by introducing a third line of argument, one that emphasizes the effectiverole state institutions play in maintaining such arrangements for long periods of time, often against the public will. Niva Golan-Nadir is a Research Associate at the University at Albany, SUNY, USA, and a teaching faculty member at Reichman University (IDC Herzliya) and The Open University of Israel. 606 $aPublic administration 606 $aPublic policy 606 $aPolitical planning 606 $aPolitical science 606 $aPublic Administration 606 $aAgenda Setting 606 $aPolicy Formulation 606 $aGovernance and Government 615 0$aPublic administration. 615 0$aPublic policy. 615 0$aPolitical planning. 615 0$aPolitical science. 615 14$aPublic Administration. 615 24$aAgenda Setting. 615 24$aPolicy Formulation. 615 24$aGovernance and Government. 676 $a351.5694 676 $a351.5694 700 $aGolan-Nadir$b Niva$01077152 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910522917003321 996 $aPublic Preferences and Institutional Designs$92588533 997 $aUNINA