LEADER 01133nam0 22003011i 450 001 UON00516171 005 20231205105522.746 010 $a08-965996-6-3 100 $a20230721d1986 |0itac50 ba 101 $aeng 102 $aUS 105 $a|||| ||||| 200 1 $aˆThe ‰great book of post-impressionism$fDiane Kelder 210 $aNew York$cAbbeville press$dc1986 215 $a383 p.$cill.$d34 cm. 606 $aCubismo$3UONC101252$2FI 606 $aDIVISIONISMO$3UONC101609$2FI 606 $aPOST-IMPRESSIONISMO$3UONC101608$2FI 620 $aUS$dNew York$3UONL000050 676 $a759.056$cPittura. Storia, geografia, persone. Post-impressionismo$v22 700 1$aKELDER$bDiane$3UONV291467$01591021 712 $aAbbeville Press$3UONV270838$4650 801 $aIT$bSOL$c20250613$gRICA 899 $aSIBA - SISTEMA BIBLIOTECARIO DI ATENEO$2UONSI 912 $aUON00516171 950 $aSIBA - SISTEMA BIBLIOTECARIO DI ATENEO$dSI '900 0190 $eSI SS 6742 7 0190 $sBuono 996 $aGreat book of post-impressionism$93903646 997 $aUNIOR LEADER 09690nam 22009373 450 001 9911009193903321 005 20250207190337.0 010 $a9781643363035 010 $a1643363034 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6983327 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL6983327 035 $a(CKB)22249621600041 035 $a(OCoLC)1317326840 035 $a(OCoLC)1310645789 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)musev2_98333 035 $a(Perlego)3054679 035 $a(EXLCZ)9922249621600041 100 $a20220514d2022 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aRural Republican Realignment in the Modern South $eThe Untold Story 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aColumbia :$cUniversity of South Carolina Press,$d2022. 210 4$d©2022. 215 $a1 online resource (327 pages) 311 08$aPrint version: Hood, M. V., III Rural Republican Realignment in the Modern South Columbia : University of South Carolina Press,c2022 9781643363011 327 $aIntroduction: Texas: Thirty Years Apart -- America's Longest and Deepest Realignment -- Measuring Place and the Data Associated with It -- Presidential Republicanism and Democratic Darn Near Everything Else -- Voting for the Biggest Prize: Presidential Elections -- US Senate Elections: Republicans' Most Promising and Attainable Seats -- The Rural Transformation in Southern Gubernatorial Elections -- Rural Voters in Southern US House Elections -- Survey Says? Rural Whites' Changing Party Identification -- More Evidence: Rural Voters in Four Southern States -- How Are Rural and Urban Southerners Different? -- The 2020 Elections in the South -- Too Little, Too Late? 330 $a"Since the 1948 Dixiecrat revolt from the national Democratic Party, rural white southerners have experienced a painstakingly slow transformational shift from being fiercely loyal Democrats to stalwart Republicans. In Rural Republican Realignment in the Modern South, M. V. Hood III and Seth C. McKee examine the factors driving this movement as they detail the long and winding path rural white southerners took to the Grand Old Party.In this first book-length empirically based study focusing on rural southern voters, Hood and McKee examine their changing political behavior, arguing that their Democratic-to-Republican transition is both more recent and more durable than most political observers realize. By analyzing data collected from their own region-wide poll along with a variety of carefully mined primary-source data, the authors explain why rural white southerners have become the core group in the modern Republican voting coalition. Understanding voting patterns in the rural South, Hood and McKee contend, has become central to understanding the current electoral landscape"--$cProvided by publisher. 330 $a"Throughout the modern South many of the region's cities have become blue Democratic enclaves surrounded by crimson suburbs, and burgundy rural communities staunchly aligned with the Republican Party. This is almost a complete reversal of the pattern that existed for much of the twentieth century, during which the backbone of southern Democracy was located in rural counties. Now rural counties are the bulwark of modern southern Republicanism. What happened, and when? Those are the key questions that political scientists M. V. Hood III and Seth McKee explore in this pathbreaking study of rural Republican political realignment in the modern South. Understanding voting patterns in the rural South, and indeed in rural America more generally, has become central to understanding our current electoral landscape. In this empiracally-based study, Hood and McKee trace the shifting political affiliations in the rural South, arguing that this transition has been both more recent and more durable than most political observers realize. Whereas much of the literature on political realignment in the South has focused on urban/suburban voters, Hood and McKee set their sites on rural voters. They mine a variety of data sources to uncover granular detail about voting behavior in rural counties. They also conducted their own region-wide poll of rural voters, administered through the University of Georgia's School and Public and International Affairs (SPIA) Survey Research Center, where co-author M.V. Hood serves as director. The inclusion of original polling research represents a significant contribution and also highlights the fact that the authors are uniquely situated to offer a detailed regional analysis of rural southern politics. "Rural Republican Realignment in the Modern South" represents an extremely timely contribution to both scholarly and popular discussions surrounding the importance of region and race within contemporary electoral politics. While much of the attention in the aftermath of the 2016 presidential election focused on rural white voters in the Upper Midwest, the southern states of Florida (R +1.2%) and North Carolina (R +3.8%) both ranked among the top ten states with the narrowest margins of victory during the presidential contest. In both places, rural voters helped to fuel Republican success. The results of the 2018 midterm elections and 2020 presidential race further emphasize the importance of the American South and the rural/urban electoral divide. The authors include analysis of the 2020 election cycle and the US Senate runoff elections in Georgia, which occurred in early 2021. They make a compelling case that understanding the longer-term shift in voter preference within the rural South will remain vital to understanding both regional and national electoral patterns moving forward. The latest incarnation of the Republican Party, they write, traces its most well-worn and thus entrenched paths back to the one-party Solid Democratic South, and this is evident in the profiles of rural white supporters. In contrast, there is really no regional predecessor to the modern southern Democratic Party. Its fundamental elements are a diverse group of supporters who in the Old South would almost all have been disfranchised, played only a limited political role, or not resided in the region at all. This coalition includes northern in-migrants, African Americans, women, a growing Latino and Asian population, and a host of young people. While scholars are increasingly focusing on the changing South and how in many parts of the region high-growth urban areas are fostering Democratic competitiveness, Hood and McKee instead focus on the reason why Republicans have become so politically formidable and why the strong GOP affiliation of rural whites makes Democratic efforts to become a more viable opposition a generally slow and painstaking process. Put differently, they emphasize how partisan changes within the native white population in the South have proven capable of prolonging Republican electoral dominance as Republicanism has begun to wane among urban whites and is admittedly under siege among in-migrants to the Sunbelt"--$cProvided by publisher. 606 $aRural conditions$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst01101474 606 $aPolitics and government$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst01919741 606 $aPolitical parties$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst01069410 606 $aPolitical culture$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst01069263 606 $aParty affiliation$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst01054227 606 $aMigration, Internal$xPolitical aspects$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst01020760 606 $aDemography$xPolitical aspects$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst00890176 606 $aHISTORY / United States / State & Local / South (AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA, WV)$2bisacsh 606 $aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Process / Political Parties$2bisacsh 606 $aMigration interieure$xAspect politique$zE?tats-Unis (Sud) 606 $aDemographie$xAspect politique$zE?tats-Unis (Sud) 606 $aPartis politiques$xAdhesion$zE?tats-Unis (Sud) 606 $aMigration, Internal$xPolitical aspects$zSouthern States 606 $aDemography$xPolitical aspects$zSouthern States 606 $aPolitical culture$zSouthern States 606 $aParty affiliation$zSouthern States 606 $aPolitical parties$zSouthern States$xHistory$y21st century 607 $aSouthern States$2fast 607 $aE?tats-Unis (Sud)$xConditions rurales 607 $aSouthern States$xPolitics and government$y21st century 607 $aSouthern States$xRural conditions 615 7$aRural conditions. 615 7$aPolitics and government. 615 7$aPolitical parties. 615 7$aPolitical culture. 615 7$aParty affiliation. 615 7$aMigration, Internal$xPolitical aspects. 615 7$aDemography$xPolitical aspects. 615 7$aHISTORY / United States / State & Local / South (AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA, WV) 615 7$aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Process / Political Parties. 615 6$aMigration interieure$xAspect politique 615 6$aDemographie$xAspect politique 615 6$aPartis politiques$xAdhesion 615 0$aMigration, Internal$xPolitical aspects 615 0$aDemography$xPolitical aspects 615 0$aPolitical culture 615 0$aParty affiliation 615 0$aPolitical parties$xHistory 676 $a324.273 686 $aPOL015000$aHIS036120$2bisacsh 700 $aHood$b M. V$01660885 701 $aMcKee$b Seth Charles$f1974-$01827390 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9911009193903321 996 $aRural Republican Realignment in the Modern South$94395569 997 $aUNINA