LEADER 05284nam 2200673Ia 450 001 9910456361403321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-282-71481-3 010 $a9786612714818 010 $a3-11-021918-2 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110219180 035 $a(CKB)2550000000013557 035 $a(EBL)511849 035 $a(OCoLC)615622810 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000421736 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11269122 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000421736 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10416060 035 $a(PQKB)10771711 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC511849 035 $a(DE-B1597)36572 035 $a(OCoLC)979761666 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110219180 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL511849 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10373606 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL271481 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000013557 100 $a20091208d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aLanguage usage and language structure$b[electronic resource] /$fedited by Kasper Boye, Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen 210 $aNew York, NY $cMouton de Gruyter$d2010 215 $a1 online resource (368 p.) 225 0 $aTrends in linguistics. Studies and monographs ;$v213 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a3-11-021917-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $t Frontmatter -- $tTable of Contents -- $tIntroduction -- $tUsage and structure: The case of clausal complementation -- $tWhat conversational English tells us about the nature of grammar:A critique of Thompson's analysis of object complements -- $tUsage, structure, scientific explanation, and the role of abstraction, by linguists and by language users -- $tRaising verbs and auxiliaries in a functional theory of grammatical status -- $tThe rise of structure -- $tHow not to disagree: The emergence of structure from usage -- $tParadigmatic structure in a usage-based theory of grammaticalisation -- $tWhere do simple clauses come from? -- $tStructure, usage and variation -- $tAlternative agreement controllers in Danish: Usage or structure? -- $tSchmidt redux: How systematic is the linguistic system if variation is rampant? -- $tMore tiles on the roof: Further thoughts on incremental language production -- $tReconciling structure and usage: On the advantages of a dynamic, dialogic conception of the linguistic sign -- $tMethodology -- $tTen unwarranted assumptions in syntactic argumentation -- $t Backmatter 330 $aDuring most of the 20th century, the classical Saussurean distinction between language usage and language structure remained untranscendable in much linguistic theory. The dominant view, propagated in particular by generative grammar, was that there are structural facts and usage facts, and that in principle the former are independent of, and can be described in complete isolation from, the latter. With the appearance of functional-cognitive approaches on the scene, this view has been challenged. The view of structure as usage-based has had two consequences that make time ripe for a focused study of the interaction between usage and structure. Within the generative camp it has inspired a more explicit and precise description of the status of usage. Within the functional-cognitive camp it has blurred the status of structure. Perhaps because functionalists and cognitivists have had to position themselves in relation to generative grammar, some have emphasized the role of usage facts to the extent that structure is largely ignored. Accounts of language usage, language acquisition and language change are impossible without an assumption about what it is that is being used, acquired, or subjected to change. And more moderate functionalists and cognitive functionalists recognize both structural facts and usage facts as genuine facts central to the understanding of language. Still, the linguistic literature that shares this position does not abound with explicit, precise characterizations of the relationship between usage and structure. The present volume brings together scholars from different theoretical positions to address theoretical and methodological aspects of the relation between language usage and structure. The contributors differ with respect to how they conceive of this relation and, more basically, with respect to how they conceive of linguistic structure. What they have in common, however, is that they recognize structure and usage as non-reducible linguistic phenomena and take seriously the challenge to describe the relation between them. 410 0$aTrends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] 606 $aStructural linguistics 606 $aLanguage and languages$xUsage 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aStructural linguistics. 615 0$aLanguage and languages$xUsage. 676 $a410.1/8 686 $aER 765$2rvk 701 $aBoye$b Kasper$f1972-$01030454 701 $aEngberg-Pedersen$b Elisabeth$f1952-$01040706 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910456361403321 996 $aLanguage usage and language structure$92463781 997 $aUNINA LEADER 01117nam0 22002771i 450 001 UON00447874 005 20231205105026.298 100 $a20141201d1965 |0itac50 ba 101 $afre 102 $aFR 105 $a|||| 1|||| 200 1 $aFrançais, encore un effort... : extrait de "La Philosophie dans le boudoir"$fSade$cPrécédé de L'inconvenance majeure$fMaurice Blanchot 210 $a[Paris]$cJean-Jacques Pauvert$d1965 215 $a163 p.$d18 cm. 316 $aValore stimato$5IT-UONSI Francese26 LIB/21 410 1$1001UON00447830$12001 $aLibertés$v28 620 $aFR$dParis$3UONL002984 700 0$aSADE$3UONV224708$0713433 701 1$aBlanchot$bMaurice$3UONV129167$0155304 712 $aPauvert$3UONV255925$4650 801 $aIT$bSOL$c20250307$gRICA 899 $aSIBA - SISTEMA BIBLIOTECARIO DI ATENEO$2UONSI 912 $aUON00447874 950 $aSIBA - SISTEMA BIBLIOTECARIO DI ATENEO$dSI 26 LIB 21 $eSI SFR3877 7 21 Valore stimato$sBuono 996 $aFrançais, encore un effort..$91331604 997 $aUNIOR LEADER 03579nam 2200685Ia 450 001 9910959997203321 005 20251116175525.0 010 $a1-134-93362-2 010 $a1-280-21774-X 010 $a9786610217748 010 $a1-134-93363-0 010 $a0-203-97668-1 024 7 $a10.4324/9780203976685 035 $a(CKB)1000000000249677 035 $a(EBL)1020199 035 $a(OCoLC)811504438 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000148758 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11136643 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000148758 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10235880 035 $a(PQKB)11388000 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1020199 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1020199 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10598529 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL21774 035 $a(OCoLC)252721517 035 $a(FINmELB)ELB132691 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000249677 100 $a19930210d1993 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aEpistemic logic in the later Middle Ages /$fIvan Boh 210 $aLondon ;$aNew York $cRoutledge$d1993 210 1$aLondon ;$aNew York :$cRoutledge,$d1993. 215 $a1 online resource (201 p.) 225 0 $aTopics in medieval philosophy 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a1-138-00924-5 311 08$a0-415-05726-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [168]-180) and index. 327 $aFront Cover; Epistemic Logic in the Later Middle Ages; Copyright Page; Contents; Introduction; Acknowledgements; Part I: On logical activities from Anselm to Thomas Aquinas; 1. On some logical developments in the eleventh and twelfth centuries; 2. The thirteenth-century summulists; 3. Some epistemic elements in Grosseteste, Albert the Great,and Thomas Aquinas; Part II: Formative period of epistemic logic, 1300-80; 4. Elements of epistemic logic in Walter Burley; 5. William of Ockham's epistemic concerns; 6. The seminal period of epistemic logic: Kilvington, Heytesbury 327 $a7. Epistemic/doxastic problems at ParisPart III: Consolidation and further development of epistemic logic, 1380-1500; 8. Ralph Strode and rules of epistemic consequences; 9. The end of the fourteenth century: Peter of Mantua; 10. Epistemic definition of consequence around 1500: Frachantianus Vicentinus; Epilogue: A summary and an assessment of medieval achievements in epistemic logic; Abbreviations used in Notes and Bibliography; Notes; Bibliography; Index 330 $aEpistemic Logic studies statements containing verbs such as 'know' and 'wish'. It is one of the most exciting areas in medieval philosophy. Neglected almost entirely after the end of the Middle Ages, it has been rediscovered by philosophers of the present century. This is the first comprehensive study of the subject. Ivan Boh explores the rules for entailment between epistemic statements, the search for the conditions of knowing contingent propositions, the problems of substitutivity in intentional contexts, the relationship between epistemic and modal logic, and the problems of compo 410 0$aTopics in Medieval Philosophy 606 $aEpistemics$xHistory 606 $aLogic, Medieval 615 0$aEpistemics$xHistory. 615 0$aLogic, Medieval. 676 $a121 700 $aBoh$b Ivan$f1930-$01878084 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910959997203321 996 $aEpistemic logic in the later Middle Ages$94490596 997 $aUNINA