LEADER 01603nam0 22003491i 450 001 UON00162938 005 20231205103019.58 010 $a88-8265-201-7 100 $a20020913d2000 |0itac50 ba 101 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $a|||| ||||| 200 1 $aStabiae$estoria e architettura$e250° Anniversario degli Scavi di Stabiae 1749-1999$eConvegno Internazionale Castellammare di Stabia 25-27 Marzo 2000 /a cura di Giovanna Bonifacio e Anna Maria Sodo 205 $aRoma : L'Erma di Bretschneider$b2000 210 $a221 p. , ill ; 30 cm 215 $aIn testa al frontespizio: Ministero per i Beni e le Attivitą Culturali. Soprintendenza Archeologica di Pompei 316 $aProf. Pesando$5IT-UONSI N 2POMPEI042/07 410 1$1001UON00133793$12001 $aStudi della Soprintendenza Archeologica di Pompei$v7 606 $aSTABIA$xArcheologia$3UONC026836$2FI 606 $aSCAVI ARCHEOLOGICI$xStabia$3UONC028411$2FI 606 $aSTABIA$xArchitettura$3UONC033431$2FI 620 $aIT$dRoma$3UONL000004 676 $a937$cARCHEOLOGIA / STORIA DELL'ITALIA - fino al 476$v21 702 1$aBONIFACIO$bGiovanna$3UONV095568 702 1$aSODO$bAnna Maria$3UONV095569 712 $aL'Erma di Bretschneider$3UONV259640$4650 801 $aIT$bSOL$c20240220$gRICA 899 $aSIBA - SISTEMA BIBLIOTECARIO DI ATENEO$2UONSI 912 $aUON00162938 950 $aSIBA - SISTEMA BIBLIOTECARIO DI ATENEO$dSI N 2 POMPEI 042 07 $eSI MC 25863 5 07 Prof. Pesando 996 $aSTABIAE$9350366 997 $aUNIOR LEADER 04689nam 22004935 450 001 9910851998703321 005 20250807153011.0 010 $a3-031-51936-1 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-031-51936-9 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC31289319 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL31289319 035 $a(CKB)31518729800041 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-031-51936-9 035 $a(EXLCZ)9931518729800041 100 $a20240418d2024 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aScientia Iuris $eKnowledge and Experience in Legal Education and Practice from the Late Roman Republic to Artificial Intelligence /$fby Luca Siliquini-Cinelli 205 $a1st ed. 2024. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer Nature Switzerland :$cImprint: Springer,$d2024. 215 $a1 online resource (393 pages) 225 1 $aIus Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,$x2214-9902 ;$v112 311 08$a3-031-51935-3 327 $aChapter One ? Introduction -- Chapter Two ? Knowledge vs Experience -- Chapter Three ? The Late Roman Republic: The Inception of Metaphysical Abstractness -- Chapter Four ? The Middle Ages: The Systematic Renovation of Scientia Iuris -- Chapter Five ? Methodological Legal Positivism -- Chapter six ? The Common Law Tradition -- Chapter Seven ? Conclusion. 330 $aLaw?s regulatory reach has grown significantly over the past few decades. Yet, at the same time, law schools and legal professions in Western and Western-oriented jurisdictions have undergone an acute crisis. How is this possible? In this insightful and wide-ranging book, Luca Siliquini-Cinelli argues that these trends are in fact complementary manifestations of a single phenomenon?namely, that law is and will always be more capable of regulating social interaction without the experiential contribution of legal experts. Siliquini-Cinelli contends that the separation of law?s regulatory function from legal experts is structurally linked to the former?s nature and operational dynamics as an intellectual artifact to be used for ordering purposes. As a product of the intellect, law is a matter of knowledge, not experience. In fact, Siliquini-Cinelli holds, law?s artifactuality voids experience, including that of legal experts, making it redundant. This explains how law can thrive as a regulatory phenomenon while the very places where future legal professionals are formed and those places where it is practised are in crisis. To show this, Siliquini-Cinelli embarks upon a historical, philosophical, and comparative analysis of law?s artifactuality, focusing on the teaching, study and practise of law as intellectual endeavours, from the advent of juristic activities in the Late Roman Republic to current legal pedagogies, practices, and reforms in Civil and Common law jurisdictions. In so doing, Siliquini-Cinelli employs the Latin phrase ?scientia iuris? to explain why and how legal education and practice pursue knowledge at the expense of experience, and the serious implications this has for lawyering activities. Moving beyond established narratives, Siliquini-Cinelli argues that ?scientia iuris? ought not be reduced to dogmatic analysis (scientia iuris as doctrina iuris). Rather, ?scientia iuris? denotes the knowledge of the law sought by all those who teach, study, and practise it, and which is actualised through a form of legal thinking and argumentation that moves along reason?s metaphysical, constructivist lines (scientia iuris as cognitio iuris). Thus, scientia iuris is not the prerogative of a few legal scholars; rather, it lies at the very core of Western legal education and practice, broadly understood. The relevance of Siliquini-Cinelli?s original and interdisciplinary analysis is profound and far-reaching: the crisis that legal education and practice are undergoing is not an isolated, or accidental, event; it is a consequence of the very ways in which law has been taught, studied, and practised since Rome. . 410 0$aIus Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,$x2214-9902 ;$v112 606 $aLaw$xPhilosophy 606 $aLaw$xHistory 606 $aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History 615 0$aLaw$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aLaw$xHistory. 615 14$aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. 676 $a340.1 700 $aSiliquini Cinelli$b Luca$0611577 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910851998703321 996 $aScientia Iuris$94253595 997 $aUNINA