LEADER 03475nam 22006612 450 001 9910780092903321 005 20151005020623.0 010 $a1-107-12040-3 010 $a0-521-03883-9 010 $a0-511-04605-7 010 $a0-511-15437-2 010 $a0-511-49845-4 010 $a9786610429790 010 $a1-280-42979-8 010 $a0-511-17443-8 010 $a0-511-30229-0 035 $a(CKB)111056485620366 035 $a(EBL)201713 035 $a(OCoLC)437063156 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000225152 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11187075 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000225152 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10230457 035 $a(PQKB)10386056 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511498459 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC201713 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL201713 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10001835 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL42979 035 $a(PPN)261345567 035 $a(EXLCZ)99111056485620366 100 $a20090309d2001|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe poverty of the Linnaean hierarchy $ea philosophical study of biological taxonomy /$fMarc Ereshefsky$b[electronic resource] 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2001. 215 $a1 online resource (x, 316 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 225 1 $aCambridge studies in philosophy and biology 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 $a0-521-78170-1 311 $a0-511-01355-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 300-311) and index. 327 $gPart I:$tThe historical turn$tThe philosophy of classification --$tA primer of biological taxonomy --$tHistory and classification --$gPart II:$tThe multiplicity of nature --$tSpecies pluralism --$tHow to be a discerning pluralist --$gPart III:$tHierarchies and nomenclature --$tThe evolution of the Linnaean hierarchy --$tPost-Linnaean taxonomy --$tThe future of biological nomenclature. 330 $aThe question of whether biologists should continue to use the Linnaean hierarchy has been a hotly debated issue. Invented before the introduction of evolutionary theory, Linnaeus's system of classifying organisms is based on outdated theoretical assumptions, and is thought to be unable to provide accurate biological classifications. Marc Ereshefsky argues that biologists should abandon the Linnaean system and adopt an alternative that is more in line with evolutionary theory. He traces the evolution of the Linnaean hierarchy from its introduction to the present. He illustrates how the continued use of this system hampers our ability to classify the organic world, and then goes on to make specific recommendations for a post-Linnaean method of classification. Accessible to a wide range of readers by providing introductory chapters to the philosophy of classification and the taxonomy of biology, the book will interest both scholars and students of biology and the philosophy of science. 410 0$aCambridge studies in philosophy and biology. 606 $aBiology$vClassification$xPhilosophy 615 0$aBiology$xPhilosophy. 676 $a578/.01/2 700 $aEreshefsky$b Marc$01531334 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910780092903321 996 $aThe poverty of the Linnaean hierarchy$93776919 997 $aUNINA LEADER 01280nam0 22002891i 450 001 UON00099751 005 20231205102547.784 010 $a31-10-09919-5 100 $a20020107d1984 |0itac50 ba 101 $ager 102 $aDE 105 $a|||| 1|||| 200 1 $aˆDer ‰Aristotelismus bei den Griechen$evon Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. 2.er Band$eDer Aristotelismus im 1. und 2. Jh. N. Chr. / Von Paul Moraux 210 $aBerlin$aNew York$cW. de Gruyter$d1984 215 $axxx, 825 p.$d23 cm 410 1$1001UON00088548$12001 $aPeripatoi$ephilologisch-historische Studien$fhrsg. von W. Kullmann, R. W. Sharples, J. Wiesner$v6 517 1$3UON00364440$aˆDer ‰Aristotelismus im I. und II. Jh. n. Chr. / Paul Moraux 620 $aUS$dNew York$3UONL000050 620 $aDE$dBerlin$3UONL003157 700 1$aMORAUX$bPaul$3UONV061234$0158929 712 $aDe Gruyter$3UONV248587$4650 801 $aIT$bSOL$c20240220$gRICA 899 $aSIBA - SISTEMA BIBLIOTECARIO DI ATENEO$2UONSI 912 $aUON00099751 950 $aSIBA - SISTEMA BIBLIOTECARIO DI ATENEO$dSI P 5 0189 02 $eSI MC 8235 5 996 $aAristotelismus bei den Griechen$9558204 997 $aUNIOR