LEADER 02134oam 2200577M 450 001 9911077240903321 005 20200213071001.1 035 $a(CKB)46358947900041 035 $a(DGPO)001199488 035 $a(OCoLC)1065632778 035 $a(EXLCZ)9946358947900041 100 $a20080923d1948 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAmending the Act of April 25, 1947, relating to the establishment of the Theodore Roosevelt National Memorial Park. May 27 (legislative day, May 20), 1948. -- Ordered to be printed 210 1$aWashington, DC :$c[publisher not identified],$d1948. 215 $a1 online resource (3 pages) 225 1 $aSenate report / 80th Congress, 2nd session. Senate ;$vno. 1419 225 1 $a[United States congressional serial set] ;$v[serial set no. 11207] 300 $aBatch processed record: Metadata reviewed, not verified. Some fields updated by batch processes. 300 $aFDLP item number not assigned. 300 $aElectronic resource. 606 $aBoundaries 606 $aAdjoining landowners 606 $aLand titles$xRegistration and transfer 606 $aLegislative amendments 606 $aMonuments 606 $aMemorials 606 $aMuseums 606 $aNational parks and reserves 608 $aLegislative materials.$2lcgft 615 0$aBoundaries. 615 0$aAdjoining landowners. 615 0$aLand titles$xRegistration and transfer. 615 0$aLegislative amendments. 615 0$aMonuments. 615 0$aMemorials. 615 0$aMuseums. 615 0$aNational parks and reserves. 701 $aButler$b Hugh Alfred$f1878-1954$pRepublican (NE)$01903249 801 0$bWYU 801 1$bWYU 801 2$bOCLCO 801 2$bOCLCQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9911077240903321 996 $aAmending the Act of April 25, 1947, relating to the establishment of the Theodore Roosevelt National Memorial Park. May 27 (legislative day, May 20), 1948. -- Ordered to be printed$94596962 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03984oam 2200697 a 450 001 9911143364403321 005 20260415134612.0 010 $a9783110965964 010 $a3110965968 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110965964 035 $a(CKB)2670000000249447 035 $a(EBL)893525 035 $a(OCoLC)843634935 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000594599 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11336650 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000594599 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10548163 035 $a(PQKB)10871994 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC893525 035 $a(WaSeSS)Ind00008661 035 $a(DE-B1597)47046 035 $a(OCoLC)979590088 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110965964 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL893525 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10591142 035 $a(Perlego)652092 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000249447 100 $a20010810d2001 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAnthropology as memory $eElias Canetti's and Franz Baermann Steiner's responses to the Shoah /$fMichael Mack 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aTu?bingen :$cMax Niemeyer Verlag,$d2001. 215 $a1 online resource (240 pages) 225 0 $aConditio Judaica 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 0 $a9783484651340 311 0 $a3484651342 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [205]-226) and index. 327 $apt. 1. Elias Canetti : anthropology as Literature -- pt. 2. Franz Baermann Steiner : anthropology and totalitarian terror -- pt. 3. Style, law and danger. 330 $aThis essay is offered particularly as a contribution to the relationship between theological and literary writings on the Holocaust. Franz Baermann Steiner's (1909-1952) detailed sociological work - he taught at the Department of Social Anthropology at Oxford and developed a sociology of danger that strongly influenced Mary Douglas, T. W. Adorno, Iris Murdoch, H.G. Adler and Julia Kristeva - contrasts with Canetti's emphasis on shock. Canetti's response to the Holocaust constitutes, in Dominick LaCapra's terms, an 'acting out' of trauma: a comparison between Canetti's »Masse und Macht« and the anthropological texts he uses brings to the fore his bleak depicton of humanity. By contrast, Steiner - in comparison to Canetti - lays emphasis on 'working through' the Holocaust, that is to say, on overcoming the paralysis of trauma by reflecting critically on values that might transform a damaged society. However, Canetti's depiction of humanity cannot entirely be seen in LaCapra's notion of 'acting out': for through the shock of 'acting out', Canetti nonetheless wants to bring about a 'working through'. Similarly, despite the 'working through' shock and trauma are dramatized in Steiner's poetry and his aphoristic writings. Morever, Canetti thematizes an ethical impact on his readership in his aphorisms. In response to the Holocaust both writers advance a theory of power: what Steiner calls danger, Canetti attacks as death. Steiner's and Canetti's respective responses to the Holocaust consists in a critique of static ways of thought, affirming 'metamorphosis', and deconceptualized understanding of the world which connects linguistic fluidity to the everchanging contextualities of social and embodied life. 410 0$aConditio Judaica;$v34 606 $aAnthropology in literature 606 $aHolocaust, Jewish (1939-1945)$xInfluence 606 $aAnthropology 615 0$aAnthropology in literature. 615 0$aHolocaust, Jewish (1939-1945)$xInfluence. 615 0$aAnthropology. 676 $a830.9/358 686 $aGN 3721$2rvk 700 $aMack$b Michael$f1969-2020.$01495291 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9911143364403321 996 $aAnthropology as memory$94847704 997 $aUNINA