LEADER 02620oam 2200553M 450 001 9911075582703321 005 20191123063214.4 035 $a(CKB)46363722500041 035 $a(DGPO)001146313 035 $a(OCoLC)1065842945 035 $a(EXLCZ)9946363722500041 100 $a20070221d1857 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aIn the Senate of the United States. January 14, 1857. -- Ordered to be printed. Mr. Mason made the following report. (To accompany Bill S. 504.) The Committee on Foreign Relations, to whom was referred the memorial of Alexander I. Atocha, praying that his claims against Mexico, disallowed by the commissioners under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, may be investigated, and if found just paid by the United States, have patiently considered the subject, and now report .. 210 1$aWashington, DC :$c[publisher not identified],$d1857. 215 $a1 online resource (4 pages) 225 1 $aSenate report / 34th Congress, 3rd session. Senate ;$vno. 304 225 1 $a[United States congressional serial set ] ;$v[serial set no. 891] 300 $aTitle from opening lines of text. 300 $aBatch processed record: Metadata reviewed, not verified. Some fields updated by batch processes. 606 $aDeportation 606 $aGovernment liability 606 $aGovernment liability (International law) 606 $aClaims 606 $aTreaties 606 $aAmericans$zForeign countries 607 $aMexico City (Mexico) 608 $aLegislative materials.$2lcgft 615 0$aDeportation. 615 0$aGovernment liability. 615 0$aGovernment liability (International law) 615 0$aClaims. 615 0$aTreaties. 615 0$aAmericans 701 $aMason$b J. M$g(James Murray),$f1798-1871$pDemocrat (VA)$01392850 801 0$bWYU 801 1$bWYU 801 2$bOCLCO 801 2$bOCLCA 801 2$bOCLCQ 801 2$bOCLCO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9911075582703321 996 $aIn the Senate of the United States. January 14, 1857. -- Ordered to be printed. Mr. Mason made the following report. (To accompany Bill S. 504.) The Committee on Foreign Relations, to whom was referred the memorial of Alexander I. Atocha, praying that his claims against Mexico, disallowed by the commissioners under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, may be investigated, and if found just paid by the United States, have patiently considered the subject, and now report .$94649607 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02597nam 2200361z- 450 001 9910557674403321 005 20210630 010 $a3-7489-2519-0 035 $a(CKB)5490000000111189 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/70972 035 $a(oapen)70972 035 $a(EXLCZ)995490000000111189 100 $a20202106d2021 |y 0 101 0 $ager 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDie zeitliche Wirkung von Urteilen des EuGH$eMaßgaben des Unionsrechts und Reaktionsmöglichkeiten mitgliedstaatlicher Gerichte 210 $abaden-baden$d2021 215 $a1 electronic resource (620 p.) 225 1 $aInternationales Recht der Gegenwart$vBand 6 311 08$a3-8487-8101-8 330 $aAgainst the background of the interconnection between the Union legal order and the legal orders of the Member States, the temporal effect of ECJ judgments is one of the central elements of Union law. Following a careful analysis of the parameters of Union law that shape it, the book deals with the possibilities of courts of Member States to react to an interpretation of Union law by the ECJ whose effects have not been limited in time. By focusing in particular on the "enforcement dimension" of Union law, it contributes to determining the status of the primacy of Union law and makes the hybrid nature of interpretation in conformity with directives more visible. 330 $aVor dem Hintergrund der Verschränkung von Unionsrechtsordnung und mitgliedstaatlichen Rechtsordnungen ist die zeitliche Wirkung von Urteilen des EuGH einer der zentralen Bausteine des Unionsrechts. Im Anschluss an die sorgfältige Aufarbeitung der sie prägenden unionsrechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen setzt sich die Arbeit mit den Möglichkeiten mitgliedstaatlicher Gerichte zur Reaktion auf eine in zeitlicher Hinsicht nicht begrenzte Auslegung des Unionsrechts durch den EuGH auseinander. Indem sie insbesondere die "Durchsetzungsdimension" des Unionsrechts in den Blick nimmt, leistet sie einen Beitrag zur Bestimmung des Stellenwerts des Anwendungsvorrangs und lässt die hybride Natur der richtlinienkonformen Auslegung stärker sichtbar werden. 517 $aZeitliche Wirkung von Urteilen des EuGH 606 $aLBBR, LBHG, 1QFE$2bicssc 615 7$aLBBR, LBHG, 1QFE 700 $aRiegger$b Stephan$4auth$01076637 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910557674403321 996 $aZeitliche Wirkung von Urteilen des EuGH$92587682 997 $aUNINA