LEADER 04148nam 22005415 450 001 9911049159203321 005 20260102122632.0 010 $a3-662-71934-7 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-662-71934-3 035 $a(CKB)44770027200041 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC32470595 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL32470595 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-662-71934-3 035 $a(EXLCZ)9944770027200041 100 $a20260102d2025 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aHow and Why Do Courts Cite? $eIntertextual References in the Decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany and the Supreme Court of Canada /$fby Joy Steigler-Herms 205 $a1st ed. 2025. 210 1$aBerlin, Heidelberg :$cSpringer Berlin Heidelberg :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2025. 215 $a1 online resource (246 pages) 225 0 $aLaw and Criminology Series 311 08$a3-662-71933-9 327 $a1. Introduction -- 2. Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Concept of Citation.- 3. Functions of Citations -- 4. Citing and Positioning: Modality and Evidentiality -- 5. Zitationspraktiken in Citation Practices Depending on Legal Systems: Common Law and Civil Law -- 6. How and Why Do Courts Cite? An Empirical Study Using the Example of the Federal Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Canada -- 7. Overall Conclusion, Review, Outlook. 330 $aCourt decisions can neither be made nor drafted without references to other texts; citations are omnipresent in judicial rulings. Every decision takes relevant normative texts or precedents into account, primarily to ensure coherent case law. Through the act of referencing, courts demonstrate that their decisions are based on an established legal doctrine. This integration into the existing doctrine legitimizes the decision and thus creates legal certainty through predictability. Moreover, court decisions also contain references to texts that do not possess legal authority and therefore cannot be assigned such a function. Among the sources cited by courts, alongside statutory texts, are?for example?references to foreign law, scholarly sources, or even literary texts. In view of this, the present study addresses the question of how and why courts cite. Using decisions from the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany and the Supreme Court of Canada as examples, the interdisciplinary study proposes both philological and legal evaluation criteria for the empirical reconstruction of citation functions and furthermore adopts a comparative perspective on jurisdiction-related differences in citation practices in courts. Joy Steigler-Herms is a research associate in subproject B02, ?How and Why Do Courts Cite? Citations and References in Judgments of the Federal Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Canada,? at the Collaborative Research Center 1385 ?Law and Literature? at the University of Münster. The translation was done with the help of artificial intelligence. A subsequent human revision was done primarily in terms of content. This book is a translation of an original German edition. The translation was done with the help of artificial intelligence (machine translation by the service DeepL.com). A subsequent human revision was done primarily in terms of content, so that the book will read stylistically differently from a conventional translation. 410 0$aLaw and Criminology Series 606 $aLiterature 606 $aLaw$xPhilosophy 606 $aLaw$xHistory 606 $aLiterary Methods 606 $aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History 615 0$aLiterature. 615 0$aLaw$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aLaw$xHistory. 615 14$aLiterary Methods. 615 24$aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. 676 $a347.077 700 $aSteigler-Herms$b Joy$01885253 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9911049159203321 996 $aHow and Why Do Courts Cite$94520409 997 $aUNINA