LEADER 03968nam 22006135 450 001 9911022179903321 005 20250831130209.0 010 $a3-032-01275-9 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-032-01275-3 035 $a(CKB)40851809700041 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-032-01275-3 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC32291858 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL32291858 035 $a(EXLCZ)9940851809700041 100 $a20250831d2025 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aRefugee Protection Crises and Transit Europe $eImmediate Responses, Selective Memory, and the Self-Serving Politics of Diversity /$fby Julija Sardeli? 205 $a1st ed. 2025. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer Nature Switzerland :$cImprint: Springer,$d2025. 215 $a1 online resource (XIII, 121 p.) 225 1 $aIMISCOE Research Series,$x2364-4095 311 08$a3-032-01274-0 327 $aChapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. A Model response? -- Chapter 3. Constructing Temporary Protection -- Chapter 4. Hyper-Temporariness and Transit Migration -- Chapter 5. The Return of Limited, Conditional, and Selective Temporary Protection -- Chapter 6. Conclusion. 330 $aThis open-access book presents a socio-legal analysis of immediate responses to large-scale refugee displacement in Europe after the 1951 Refugee Convention came into force, focusing on the countries to which refugees initially fled or through which they passed (namely Austria and, initially, Yugoslavia, followed by several of the former Yugoslav countries). First, it investigates the immediate responses to refugee movements following the suppression of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution by Soviet troops. Second, it examines the responses to individuals seeking asylum after being displaced during the post-Yugoslav wars of the 1990s. Third, it analyses the responses of the same countries to refugees fleeing Global South countries (predominantly Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan) in 2015 and 2016. Finally, it explores how these countries responded to the mass displacement of refugees from Ukraine. The book argues that these countries have positioned themselves as ?transit? or temporary protection countries in order to avoid assuming long-term responsibility for a larger number of refugees. As a consequence, they granted various forms of temporary legal status to refugees that differed from the refugee status defined in the 1951 Refugee Convention. These legal statuses were hierarchical (in terms of the rights attached to them) and racialized, with the fewest rights granted to refugees from the Global South and other negatively racialized groups. The book traces the usage of self-serving politics of diversity and selective memory to legitimise why refugees could not be protected long-term in these countries, and also why there were such differences in treatment of refugees. 410 0$aIMISCOE Research Series,$x2364-4095 606 $aEmigration and immigration 606 $aEmigration and immigration$xGovernment policy 606 $aPopulation$xEconomic aspects 606 $aHuman geography 606 $aHuman Migration 606 $aMigration Policy 606 $aPopulation Economics 606 $aHuman Geography 615 0$aEmigration and immigration. 615 0$aEmigration and immigration$xGovernment policy. 615 0$aPopulation$xEconomic aspects. 615 0$aHuman geography. 615 14$aHuman Migration. 615 24$aMigration Policy. 615 24$aPopulation Economics. 615 24$aHuman Geography. 676 $a304.8 700 $aSardeli?$b Julija$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01281120 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9911022179903321 996 $aRefugee Protection Crises and Transit Europe$94430636 997 $aUNINA