LEADER 03672nam  22006375  450 
001 9911011658103321
005 20250619125411.0
010   $a981-9774-82-9
024 7 $a10.1007/978-981-97-7482-1
035   $a(CKB)39397915400041
035   $a(DE-He213)978-981-97-7482-1
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC32176711
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL32176711
035   $a(OCoLC)1528963245
035   $a(EXLCZ)9939397915400041
100   $a20250619d2025      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 14$aThe Chinese Particle De /$fby Quan Wan
205   $a1st ed. 2025.
210  1$aSingapore :$cSpringer Nature Singapore :$cImprint: Springer,$d2025.
215   $a1 online resource (XV, 167 p. 23 illus., 2 illus. in color.) 
225 1 $aSpringerBriefs in Chinese Grammar,$x3005-0553 ;$v2
311 08$a981-9774-84-5 
311 08$a981-9774-81-0 
327   $aIntroduction -- Separation or unification -- Presence or absence -- Syntactic distribution -- Functions -- Nominalization -- Self-designation and transferred-designation -- Reference-point construction -- The composition of the N-de V structure -- The problematic nature of endocentric constructions -- De in the generative tradition -- State-of-affairs Sentences -- On Sentences like Ta De Laoshi Dang-de Hao -- Possessives as Patients -- Chinese Grammar Beyond Indo-European Perspectives - The Final Word.
330   $aThis book indicates that the nature and function of de is one of the core issues in the study of Chinese grammar. There are many related studies, which are not only a long-term controversial and difficult problem, but also a theoretical issue that constantly invites the renewal of research methods. This book mainly focuses on the following aspects, summarizes the achievements of the previous studies, and expounds the possible research directions in the future: 1. How many morphemes can de be analyzed into? 2. Is the basic function of the attributive containing the word de qualitative or descriptive? 3. What determines the presence and distribution of de? What is the Reference-Object Construction? 4. Can the theory of endocentric construction be used to analyze de? 5. Is de a nominalizer? What is the relationship between the self-designation and the transferred designation of de? How to treat the construction "N de V"? 6. Is de a tense-aspect auxiliary in the event sentences "V de O" and "VO de"? What is the function of the sentence final de? Is de a modal particle? 7. The issues of pseudo-attributive vs. quasi-attributive in understanding de.
410  0$aSpringerBriefs in Chinese Grammar,$x3005-0553 ;$v2
606   $aLinguistics
606   $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSyntax
606   $aLinguistics$xMethodology
606   $aAsia$xLanguages
606   $aTheoretical Linguistics / Grammar
606   $aSyntax
606   $aResearch Methods in Language and Linguistics
606   $aAsian Languages
615  0$aLinguistics.
615  0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSyntax.
615  0$aLinguistics$xMethodology.
615  0$aAsia$xLanguages.
615 14$aTheoretical Linguistics / Grammar.
615 24$aSyntax.
615 24$aResearch Methods in Language and Linguistics.
615 24$aAsian Languages.
676   $a410.1
700   $aWan$b Quan$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01831050
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9911011658103321
996   $aThe Chinese Particle De$94402913
997   $aUNINA