LEADER 03368nam 22005535 450 001 9911010529103321 005 20250612130303.0 010 $a3-031-92990-X 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-031-92990-8 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC32154729 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL32154729 035 $a(CKB)39265582000041 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-031-92990-8 035 $a(OCoLC)1524423739 035 $a(EXLCZ)9939265582000041 100 $a20250612d2025 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aArgument Dialectics: The Place of Reasons in Logic /$fby Hubert Marraud 205 $a1st ed. 2025. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer Nature Switzerland :$cImprint: Springer,$d2025. 215 $a1 online resource (307 pages) 225 1 $aArgumentation Library,$x2215-1907 ;$v45 311 08$a3-031-92989-6 327 $a1 Introduction -- 2 What is Argument Dialectics? -- 3 Argument Models -- 4 Counterargumentation -- 5 Compound Arguments -- 6 Logical, Dialectical and Rhetorical Criticism -- 7 Discussants, Logic Exports, Judges and Onlookers -- 8 Epilogue. A Reasonable Heresy -- Index. 330 $aThis book is a systematic exposition of Argument Dialectics (AD). Despite its name, argument dialectics is a logical approach to argumentation theory. AD stands out among theories of argument because of three unusual features: it is reasons-based, holistic and particularistic. This implies that AD conceives of logic as a theory of the dialectical construction of reasons, not as a theory of inferences. Consequently, contrary to other logical approaches, AD focuses on the study of inter-argumentative relations, especially those of opposition and weighing. The book makes an extensive use of the theory of reasons, a branch of metaethics that has been a very valuable quarry of intuitions and concepts for the elaboration of a reason-based theory of argument. The oppositions generalism-particularism and atomism-holism, proposed by Jonathan Dancy, which play a central role in the book and in the development of AD, have been adapted from the theory of reasons, and the same can be said of the distinction between different statuses of reasons that AD associates with different kinds of counterarguments. Conceiving of the theory of argument in terms of reasons has the effect of situating the paradigm of argumentation in practical argumentation/reasoning ?about what to do? rather than in theoretical argumentation ?about what to believe?, as inference-based theories do. Hence, this book is of interest to argumentation theorists, communication theorists, epistemologists, linguists, moral philosophers, and philosophers of law. 410 0$aArgumentation Library,$x2215-1907 ;$v45 606 $aLogic 606 $aPhilosophy 606 $aMethodology 606 $aLogic 606 $aPhilosophical Methods 615 0$aLogic. 615 0$aPhilosophy. 615 0$aMethodology. 615 14$aLogic. 615 24$aPhilosophical Methods. 676 $a160 700 $aMarraud$b Hubert$01828713 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9911010529103321 996 $aArgument Dialectics: The Place of Reasons in Logic$94402915 997 $aUNINA