LEADER 03798nam 22006135 450 001 9911009375503321 005 20241209110404.0 010 $z0-520-29541-2 010 $z0-520-29540-4 010 $a9780520968172 010 $a0520968174 024 7 $a10.1525/9780520968172 035 $a(CKB)4100000007186817 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5607540 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0002049207 035 $a(DE-B1597)534795 035 $a(OCoLC)1039313268 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780520968172 035 $a(Perlego)866624 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000007186817 100 $a20200406h20192019 fg 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aScrew consent $ea better politics of sexual justice /$fJoseph J. Fischel 210 1$aBerkeley, CA :$cUniversity of California Press,$d[2019] 210 4$dİ2019 215 $a1 online resource (ix, 267 pages) $cillustrations 225 1 $aCalifornia scholarship online 300 $aPreviously issued in print: 2019. 311 08$aPrint version : 9780520295407 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter --$tContents --$tAcknowledgments --$tIntroduction: When Consent Isn't Sexy --$t1. Kink and Cannibals, or Why We Should Probably Ban American Football --$t2. The Trouble with Mothers' Boyfriends, or Against Uncles --$t3. The Trouble with Transgender "Rapists" --$t4. Horses and Corpses: Notes on the Wrongness of Sex with Children, the Inappositeness of Consent, and the Weirdness of Heterosomething Masculinity --$t5. Cripping Consent: Autonomy and Access --$tConclusion: #MeFirst-Undemocratic Hedonism --$tAppendices --$tNotes --$tCourt Cases Cited --$tBibliography --$tIndex 330 $aWhen we talk about sex-whether great, good, bad, or unlawful-we often turn to consent as both our erotic and moral savior. We ask questions like, What counts as sexual consent? How do we teach consent to impressionable youth, potential predators, and victims? How can we make consent sexy? What if these are all the wrong questions? What if our preoccupation with consent is hindering a safer and better sexual culture? By foregrounding sex on the social margins (bestial, necrophilic, cannibalistic, and other atypical practices), Screw Consent shows how a sexual politics focused on consent can often obscure, rather than clarify, what is wrong about wrongful sex. Joseph J. Fischel argues that the consent paradigm, while necessary for effective sexual assault law, diminishes and perverts our ideas about desire, pleasure, and injury. In addition to the criticisms against consent leveled by feminist theorists of earlier generations, Fischel elevates three more: consent is insufficient, inapposite, and riddled with scope contradictions for regulating and imagining sex. Fischel proposes instead that sexual justice turns more productively on concepts of sexual autonomy and access. Clever, witty, and adeptly researched, Screw Consent promises to change how we understand consent, sexuality, and law in the United States today. 410 0$aCalifornia scholarship online. 606 $aSexual consent 606 $aSex$xPolitical aspects 606 $aSexual ethics 606 $aSex and law 615 0$aSexual consent. 615 0$aSex$xPolitical aspects. 615 0$aSexual ethics. 615 0$aSex and law. 676 $a176/.4 700 $aFischel$b Joseph J.$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01826181 702 $aO?Connell$b Hilary$4ctb$4https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/ctb 801 0$bDE-B1597 801 1$bDE-B1597 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9911009375503321 996 $aScrew consent$94394137 997 $aUNINA