LEADER 02201nam 2200421Ia 450 001 996393259803316 005 20200824132845.0 035 $a(CKB)3810000000006339 035 $a(EEBO)2248565695 035 $a(OCoLC)ocm12578937e 035 $a(OCoLC)12578937 035 $a(EXLCZ)993810000000006339 100 $a19850920d1696 uy | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||a|bb| 200 10$aHistorical collections concerning church affairs$b[electronic resource] $eIn which it is shew'd, from the ancient church historians, fathers, and other ecclesiastical writers, that the right to dispose of bishops, purely in relation to their charges, in their respective districts, was believed to be subjected in the clergy alone, as a separate independent body from the lay power, during the reigns of Constantine and Constantius, the two first Christian emperors: and that it was the judgment of the Catholick Christians, in those days, if the secular magistrate, or any irresistible party did assume the same right, upon any consideration whatever, that they were not to be recev'd nor obey'd in the execution of it. : To which are added, some occasional observations upon Dr. Hody's book, called, The case of the sees vacant, by an unjust and uncanonical deprivation, stated. /$fby a Presbyter of the Church of England 210 $aLondon, $c[s.n.]$dPrinted in the year, 1696 215 $a[36], 186 p 300 $aAttributed to Simon Lowth. cf. NUC pre-1956. 300 $aTable of contents: p. [22]-[36] 300 $aErrata: p. [36] 300 $aItem at reel 965:9 identified as Wing L3326 (number cancelled). 300 $aReproductions of originals in Cambridge University Library and Union Theological Seminary Library, New York. 330 $aeebo-0216 606 $aChurch history 606 $aBishops$vEarly works to 1800 615 0$aChurch history. 615 0$aBishops 700 $aLowth$b Simon$f1630?-1720.$01007130 801 0$bEAA 801 1$bEAA 801 2$bm/c 801 2$bUMI 801 2$bWaOLN 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996393259803316 996 $aHistorical collections concerning church affairs$92398963 997 $aUNISA LEADER 01176nam 2200373 450 001 9910713752203321 005 20210112105333.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002504162 035 $a(OCoLC)1230248908 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002504162 100 $a20210112d2018 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aSafety walk-arounds for managers 210 1$a[Washington, D.C.] :$cOSHA :$cNIOSH,$d[2018?] 215 $a1 online resource (2 unnumbered pages) $ccolor illustrations 517 1 $aSafe + sound 517 1 $aSafety walk-arounds for managers fact sheet 606 $aLabor inspection$zUnited States 606 $aIndustrial safety$zUnited States 615 0$aLabor inspection 615 0$aIndustrial safety 712 02$aUnited States.$bOccupational Safety and Health Administration, 712 02$aNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 801 0$bGPO 801 1$bGPO 801 2$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910713752203321 996 $aSafety walk-arounds for managers$93349608 997 $aUNINA LEADER 00848nam0-2200277 --450 001 9910984895803321 005 20250317094911.0 010 $a9791254772980 020 $aIT$b2023-10099 100 $a20250317d2023----kmuy0itay5050 ba 101 0 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $a 001yy 200 1 $a<>doppio custode$eun modello per la giustizia costituzionale europea$fFrancesco Medico 210 $aBologna$cBologna University Press$d2023 215 $a379 p.$d24 cm 225 1 $aSeminario giuridico della Università di Bologna$v328 676 $a342.24020269$v23$zita 700 1$aMedico,$bFrancesco$f<1993- >$01792239 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gREICAT$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a9910984895803321 952 $aUNIV. 29 (328)$b2025/528$fFGBC 959 $aFGBC 996 $aDoppio custode$94330598 997 $aUNINA