LEADER 03696nam 22006133 450 001 9910984667603321 005 20250214194314.0 010 $a9781503636897 010 $a1503636895 024 7 $a10.1515/9781503636897 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC30683592 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL30683592 035 $a(DE-B1597)666674 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781503636897 035 $a(CKB)27962346700041 035 $a(OCoLC)1393303351 035 $a(EXLCZ)9927962346700041 100 $a20230812d2023 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aSupreme Bias $eGender and Race in U. S. Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aStanford, California:$cStanford University Press,$d2023. 210 4$dİ2023. 215 $a1 online resource (292 pages) 311 08$aPrint version: Collins, Paul M., Jr. Supreme Bias Redwood City : Stanford University Press,c2023 9781503636880 327 $aCover -- Title Page -- Copyright -- Contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- One: Diversifying the Federal Courts -- Two: The Supreme Court Confirmation Process -- Three: Theorizing Bias in the Confirmation Hearings -- Four: Professional Competence and Expertise -- Five: Interruptions -- Six: Language Choices -- Seven: Gender, Race, and the Thomas-Hill and Kavanaugh-Blasey Ford Special Sessions -- Eight: Reflecting and Looking Forward -- Notes -- References -- Index. 330 $a"In Supreme Bias, Christina L. Boyd, Paul M. Collins, Jr., and Lori A. Ringhand, present for the first time a comprehensive analysis of the dynamics of race and gender at the Supreme Court confirmation hearings held before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Drawing on their deep knowledge of the confirmation hearings, as well as rich new qualitative and quantitative evidence, the authors highlight how the women and people of color who have sat before the Committee have faced a significantly different confirmation process than their white, male colleagues. Despite being among the most qualified and well-credentialed lawyers of their respective generations, female nominees and nominees of color face more skepticism of their professional competence, are subjected to stereotype-based questioning, and are more frequently interrupted and described in less positive terms by senators. In addition to revealing the disturbing extent to which race and gender bias exists even at the highest echelon of U.S. legal power, this book also provides concrete suggestions for how that bias can be reduced in the future"--$cProvided by publisher. 606 $aDiscrimination in justice administration$zUnited States 606 $aBias (Law)$zUnited States 606 $aRace discrimination$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States 606 $aSex discrimination against women$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States 606 $aJudges$xSelection and appointment$zUnited States 606 $aLegislative hearings$zUnited States 615 0$aDiscrimination in justice administration 615 0$aBias (Law) 615 0$aRace discrimination$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aSex discrimination against women$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aJudges$xSelection and appointment 615 0$aLegislative hearings 676 $a347.73/2634 700 $aCollins$b Paul M., Jr$096132 701 $aRinghand$b Lori$01793386 701 $aBoyd$b Christina$01793387 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910984667603321 996 $aSupreme Bias$94333087 997 $aUNINA