LEADER 03490nam  2200841 a 450 
001 9910974916203321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a9786612195662
010   $a9781282195660
010   $a1282195662
010   $a9783119162166
010   $a3119162167
010   $a9783110201987
010   $a3110201984
024 7 $a10.1515/9783110201987
035   $a(CKB)1000000000689102
035   $a(EBL)325598
035   $a(OCoLC)191926306
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000340351
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12072355
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000340351
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10388063
035   $a(PQKB)10273237
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC325598
035   $a(DE-B1597)32955
035   $a(OCoLC)979970885
035   $a(DE-B1597)9783110201987
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL325598
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10197238
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL219566
035   $a(OCoLC)290492611
035   $a(Perlego)1158851
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000689102
100   $a20061006d2005      uy         0
101 0 $ager
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aMetasprachdiskurse $eEinstellungen zu Anglizismen und ihre wissenschaftliche Rezeption /$fJurgen Spitzmuller
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aBerlin ;$aNew York $cW. De Gruyter$d2005
215   $a1 online resource (492 p.)
225 1 $aLinguistik, Impulse & Tendenzen,$x1612-8702 ;$v11
300   $aOriginally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--Albert-Ludwigs-Universitat, Freiburg i.Br., 2003/04.
311 08$a9783110184587 
311 08$a3110184583 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [371]-476).
327   $t Frontmatter -- $tInhaltsverzeichnis -- $tEinleitung -- $t1 Der Stand der Forschung -- $t2 Terminologie und Methode -- $t3 Das Korpus zum öffentlichen Diskurs -- $t4 Die Entwicklung des Anglizismendiskurses von 1990 bis 2001 -- $t5 Metasprachliche Bezeichnungen -- $t6 Metaphorik -- $t7 Argumentationen -- $t8 Perspektiven des linguistischen Diskurses -- $t9 Zusammenfassung und Fazit -- $t Backmatter
330   $aThis study is the first to examine in detail the public and academic discussions ("metalinguistic discourses") from 1990 to 2001 on the subject of anglicisms in German. The central question is one of why attempts by linguists to participate in the public discourse and move this towards a more objective debate largely failed. On the basis of numerous statements in the media and from professional linguists, the study demonstrates the reasons for the divergent assessments of the phenomenon in academic and public circles.
410  0$aLinguistik, Impulse & Tendenzen ;$v11.
606   $aGerman language$xDiscourse analysis
606   $aGerman language$xForeign elements$xEnglish
606   $aEnglish language$xInfluence on German
606   $aAnglicismen$2gtt
606   $aDuits$2gtt
606   $aReceptie$2gtt
615  0$aGerman language$xDiscourse analysis.
615  0$aGerman language$xForeign elements$xEnglish.
615  0$aEnglish language$xInfluence on German.
615 17$aAnglicismen.
615 17$aDuits.
615 17$aReceptie.
676   $a430
686   $aGC 9607$2rvk
700   $aSpitzmuller$b Jurgen$0435765
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910974916203321
996   $aMetasprachdiskurse$94363228
997   $aUNINA