LEADER 04572nam 2200625 a 450 001 9910973753903321 005 20251116140850.0 010 $a9786612081927 010 $a9780309173483 010 $a0309173485 010 $a9781282081925 010 $a1282081926 010 $a9780309524988 010 $a0309524989 010 $a9780585054001 010 $a0585054002 035 $a(CKB)110986584752450 035 $a(EBL)3375636 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000263977 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12041836 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000263977 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10283166 035 $a(PQKB)11533096 035 $a(OCoLC)44961942 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3375636 035 $a(Perlego)4737409 035 $a(BIP)48194802 035 $a(EXLCZ)99110986584752450 100 $a19981020d1999 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aUncommon measures $eequivalence and linkage among educational tests /$fMichael J. Feuer ... [et al.], editors ; Committee on Equivalency and Linkage of Educational Tests, Board on Testing and Assessment, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aWashington, D.C. $cNational Academy Press$d1999 215 $a1 online resource (136 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a9780309062794 311 08$a0309062799 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 94-100). 327 $aTests and the challenge of linkage. Background. Committee's approach. Drawing inferences from tests. Drawing inferences from linked tests -- Technical aspects of links. Constructing links. Common problems in links. Evaluating links. One final caution? -- Challenges of linking to NAEP. Distinct character of NAEP. Linking to NAEP. Challenges to the validity of linkage to NAEP -- Tests and testing in the United States : a picture of diversity. Types of tests. Test content. Testing in states and districts -- Conclusions. Factors that affect the validity of links. Conclusions. Future research. 330 $aThe issues surrounding the comparability of various tests used to assess performance in schools received broad public attention during congressional debate over the Voluntary National Tests proposed by President Clinton in his 1997 State of the Union Address. Proponents of Voluntary National Tests argue that there is no widely understood, challenging benchmark of individual student performance in 4th-grade reading and 8th-grade mathematics, thus the need for a new test. Opponents argue that a statistical linkage among tests already used by states and districts might provide the sort of comparability called for by the president's proposal. Public Law 105-78 requested that the National Research Council study whether an equivalency scale could be developed that would allow test scores from existing commercial tests and state assessments to be compared with each other and with the National Assessment of Education Progress. In this book, the committee reviewed research literature on the statistical and technical aspects of creating valid links between tests and how the content, use, and purposes of education testing in the United States influences the quality and meaning of those links. The book summarizes relevant prior linkage studies and presents a picture of the diversity of state testing programs. It also looks at the unique characteristics of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Uncommon Measures provides an answer to the question posed by Congress in Public Law 105-78, suggests criteria for evaluating the quality of linkages, and calls for further research to determine the level of precision needed to make inferences about linked tests. In arriving at its conclusions, the committee acknowledged that ultimately policymakers and educators must take responsibility for determining the degree of imprecision they are willing to tolerate in testing and linking. This book provides science-based information with which to make those decisions. 606 $aEducational tests and measurements$zUnited States$xInterpretation 615 0$aEducational tests and measurements$xInterpretation. 676 $a371.26/0973 701 $aFeuer$b Michael J$01596682 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910973753903321 996 $aUncommon measures$94364321 997 $aUNINA