LEADER 03687nam  2200757Ia 450 
001 9910973745503321
005 20251017110139.0
010   $a9786610184514
010   $a9780309169899
010   $a0309169895
010   $a9781280184512
010   $a1280184515
010   $a9780309508391
010   $a0309508398
035   $a(CKB)111069351126442
035   $a(EBL)3375197
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000096445
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11108972
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000096445
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10082535
035   $a(PQKB)10904687
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3375197
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3375197
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10032387
035   $a(OCoLC)923253388
035   $a(Perlego)4731024
035   $a(DNLM)1643698
035   $a(BIP)7619131
035   $a(EXLCZ)99111069351126442
100   $a20020522d2002      ua         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aAccess to research data in the 21st century $ean on going dialogue among interested parties : report of a workshop /$fScience, Technology, and Law Panel, Policy and Global Affairs, National Research Council
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aWashington, D.C. $cNational Academy Press$dc2002
215   $a1 online resource (66 p.)
225 1 $aCompass series
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311 08$a9780309083294 
311 08$a030908329X 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $a""Front Matter""; ""Preface""; ""Acknowledgments""; ""Contents""; ""1 Historical Perspective""; ""2 The Scientific Process and the Universe of Data""; ""3 Public Access to Research Data Used in Rule Making""; ""4 Privacy vs. Openness: A View from the Bench""; ""5 Alternative Approaches to Data Access""; ""6 Closing Remarks""; ""Appendix A Science, Technology, and Law Panel""; ""Appendix B Agenda""; ""Appendix C List of Registrants""
330   $aIn the years since the Shelby Amendment, scientists, industry, and policy makers have struggled over how the public (TM)s new right of access should be applied to scientific data. There is loose agreement that research data should be accessible, but wide disagreement over the  oedepth to which the public has such a right. The National Academies (TM) Science, Technology, and Law Program held a workshop to explore the mounting tensions in the federal regulatory process between the need to provide access to research data and the need to protect the integrity of the research process. The workshop provided a picture of the debate arising from passage of the Shelby Amendment and the resulting OMB revisions of Circular A-110. This report is a summary of the workshop.
410  0$aCompass series.
606   $aCommunication in science$vCongresses
606   $aResearch$xInformation services$vCongresses
606   $aInformation technology$zUnited States$vCongresses
606   $aPublic records$xAccess control$zUnited States$vCongresses
615  0$aCommunication in science
615  0$aResearch$xInformation services
615  0$aInformation technology
615  0$aPublic records$xAccess control
676   $a501
712 02$aNational Academy of Sciences (U.S.).$bScience, Technology, and Law Panel.
712 02$aNational Academy of Sciences (U.S.).$bPolicy and global Affairs.
712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.)
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910973745503321
996   $aAccess to research data in the 21st century$94366507
997   $aUNINA