LEADER 04617nam 22007211c 450 001 9910973142003321 005 20200115203623.0 010 $a9786612118975 010 $a9781472560360 010 $a1472560361 010 $a9781282118973 010 $a1282118978 010 $a9781847314734 010 $a1847314732 024 7 $a10.5040/9781472560360 035 $a(CKB)1000000000754911 035 $a(EBL)439017 035 $a(OCoLC)567999166 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000218170 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12029773 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000218170 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10212964 035 $a(PQKB)10744063 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1772626 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC439017 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09255787 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL439017 035 $a(UtOrBLW)BP9781472560360BC 035 $a(Perlego)810159 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000754911 100 $a20140929d2009 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aParliamentary sovereignty and the Human Rights Act $fAlison L. Young 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aOxford $aPortland, Oregon $cHart Publishing $d2009. 215 $a1 online resource (196 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a9781841138305 311 08$a1841138304 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index 327 $a1 INTRODUCTION -- I. Defining Parliamentary Sovereignty: Dicey's Conception -- II. The Compatibility of the Human Rights Act 1998 with Dicey's Theory of Parliamentary Sovereignty -- III. Sovereignty Explored -- IV. In Defence of the Human Rights Act 1998 -- V. In Defence of Dicey -- 2 INTERPRETATION AND IMPLIED REPEAL -- I. Continuing Parliamentary Legislative Supremacy and the Doctrine of Implied Repeal: the Orthodox Account -- II. The Narrow Scope of Implied Repeal -- III. How to give Human Rights an 'Entrenchment Effect' -- IV. Conclusion -- 3 REDEFINITION AND THE RULE OF RECOGNITION -- I. Continuing and Self-embracing Parliamentary Legislative Supremacy -- II. Manner and Form and Redefinition -- III. Methods of Entrenchment -- IV. Conclusion -- 4 DEMOCRACY AND RIGHTS -- I. Dicey and Democracy -- II. Constitutional Rights -- III. Democratic Dialogue -- IV. Conclusion -- 5 DEMOCRATIC DIALOGUE AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 -- I. Models of Dialogue -- II. Justification of Democratic Dialogue -- III. Justifications of the Human Rights Act 1998 -- IV. Dialogue and Institutional Competences -- V. Towards a Theory of Adjudication -- VI. Conclusion -- 6 A THEORY OF ADJUDICATION -- I. The Current Legal Test -- II. A New Theory of Adjudication -- III. Conclusion -- 7 CONCLUSION -- I. A Modest Defence of Continuing Parliamentary Legislative Supremacy -- II. Conclusion 330 8 $aThe Human Rights Act 1998 is criticised for providing a weak protection of human rights. The principle of parliamentary legislative supremacy prevents entrenchment, meaning that courts cannot overturn legislation passed after the Act that contradicts Convention rights. This book investigates this assumption, arguing that the principle of parliamentary legislative supremacy is sufficiently flexible to enable a stronger protection of human rights, which can replicate the effect of entrenchment. Nevertheless, it is argued that the current protection should not be strengthened. If correctly interpreted, the Human Rights Act can facilitate democratic dialogue that enables courts to perform their proper correcting function to protect rights from abuse, whilst enabling the legislature to authoritatively determine contestable issues surrounding the extent to which human rights should be protected alongside other rights, interests and goals of a particular society. This understanding of the Human Rights Act also provides a different justification for the preservation of Dicey's conception of parliamentary sovereignty in the UK Constitution 606 $aLegislative power$zGreat Britain 606 $2Constitutional & administrative law 606 $aConstitutional history$zGreat Britain 606 $aHuman rights$zGreat Britain 615 0$aLegislative power 615 0$aConstitutional history 615 0$aHuman rights 676 $a342.41085 686 $a86.50$2bcl 700 $aYoung$b Alison L.$0198054 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 801 2$bUkLoBP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910973142003321 996 $aParliamentary sovereignty and the Human Rights Act$94469822 997 $aUNINA