LEADER 01791oam 2200505I 450 001 9910511767503321 010 $a1-315-23906-X 010 $a1-351-88792-0 010 $a1-351-88793-9 024 7 $a10.4324/9781315239064 035 $a(CKB)3710000001363278 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4858988 035 $a(OCoLC)992241272 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000001363278 100 $a20180706e20172001 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe impact of rate-of-return regulation on technological innovation /$fMark W. Frank 210 1$aLondon :$cRoutledge,$d2017. 215 $a1 online resource (135 pages) $cillustrations, tables 225 1 $aBruton Center for Development Studies Series 300 $aFirst published 2001 by Ashgate Publishing. 311 $a0-7546-1609-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $a1. Rate-of-return regulation -- 2. The Averch-Johnson model -- 3. Augmented Averch-Johnson -- 4. Research joint ventures -- 5. Evidence from electric utilities in Texas -- 6. Implications and conclusions. 410 0$aBruton Center for Development Studies (Series) 606 $aMonopolies 606 $aTechnological innovations$xManagement 606 $aRate of return 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aMonopolies. 615 0$aTechnological innovations$xManagement. 615 0$aRate of return. 676 $a658.577 700 $aFrank$b Mark W.$01067600 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910511767503321 996 $aThe impact of rate-of-return regulation on technological innovation$92551552 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04506nam 2200697 a 450 001 9910971764403321 005 20240514061246.0 010 $a1-283-35934-0 010 $a9786613359346 010 $a90-272-8001-0 035 $a(CKB)2550000000073840 035 $a(EBL)805762 035 $a(OCoLC)769342175 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000642801 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11386801 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000642801 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10652706 035 $a(PQKB)11577149 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC805762 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL805762 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10517156 035 $a(DE-B1597)719441 035 $a(DE-B1597)9789027280015 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000073840 100 $a19850226d1984 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$a"Well" in dialogue games $ea discourse analysis of the interjection "well" in idealized conversation /$fLauri Carlson 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia :$cJ. Benjamins Pub. Co.,$d1984. 215 $a1 online resource (113 pages) 225 1 $aPragmatics & beyond : an interdisciplinary series of language studies,$x0166-6258 ;$v5:5 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 0 $a90-272-2539-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aWELL IN DIALOGUE GAMES A Discourse Analysis of the Interjection well in Idealized Conversation; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Table of contents; Acknowledgements; 1.INTRODUCTION; 1.1. Aims; 1.2. Idealizations; 1.3. Chapter outlines; 2. THEORY; 2.1. Dialogue games; 2.2. Conversational analysis; 2.3. Computational models of dialogue; 2.3.1. Goal-directedness; 2.3.2. Modeling beliefs; 2.3.3. Current focus of dialogue; 2.3.4. Rules of dialogue shared by participants; 3. EARLIER TREATMENTS OF WELL; 3.1. Lakoff (1973a); 3.2. Murray (1979); 3.3. Svartvik (1980); 3.4. Owen (1981) 327 $a4. THE PRESENT TREATMENT; 4.1. The hypothesis; 4.2. Development of the hypothesis; 4.3. Data and classification; 4.3.1. Criteria pertaining to dialogue structure; 4.3.2. Utility related criteria; 4.3.3. How many meanings?; 5. WELL AS A QUALIFIER; 5.1. Question-answer exchanges; 5.1.1. Dialogue internal qualifications; 5.1.1.1. Defective questions; 5.1.1.2. Defective answers; 5.1.1.3. Demanded explanations; 5.1.2. Dialogue external qualifications; 5.1.2.1. Conversational maxims compromised; 5.1.2.2. Other interests compromised; 5.2. Other exchanges; 5.2.1. Replies; 5.2.2. Arguments 327 $a5.2.3. Corrections; 5.2.4. Comments; 5.2.5. Exclamations; 5.2.6. Topic suggestions; 6. WELL AS A FRAME; 6.1. Opening a dialogue; 6.2. Transition situations; 6.2.1. Preparatory moves; 6.2.2. Topic shift; 6.2.3. Turn taking; 6.3. Closing; 6.4. Turn internal cases; 7. CONTRASTIVE STUDIES; 7.1. Well vs. oh; 7.1.1. (?.oh); 7.1.2. Exclamation; 7.1.3. Replies; 7.1.4. Unexpected topic; 7.1.5. Disappointment; 7.1.6. Topic shift; 7.2. Well and Finnish no; 7.3. Schourup (1983); 7.3.1. Theory and methodology; 7.3.2. Hypothesis; 7.3.3. Exclamations; 7.3.4. Topic shifting; 7.3.5. Answers 327 $a7.3.6. Before questions; 7.3.7. Corrections; 8. EXTENSIONS; 8.1. Politeness; 8.2. Emotions; 8.3. Well in writing; FOOTNOTES; SOURCES OF EXAMPLES; REFERENCES 330 $aThis dialogue game approach to the discourse analysis of the English interjection well aims at the formulation of rules which would be informative (marking some contexts of use as more natural than others), systematic (applicable in a mechanical or at least in a non-ad hoc way), and adequate (showing putative competitors to be either false to fact, too narrow or too wide, or demonstrably equivalent). 410 0$aPragmatics & beyond ;$v5:5. 606 $aWell (The English word) 606 $aEnglish language$xInterjections 606 $aEnglish language$xDiscourse analysis 606 $aEnglish language$xSpoken English 615 0$aWell (The English word) 615 0$aEnglish language$xInterjections. 615 0$aEnglish language$xDiscourse analysis. 615 0$aEnglish language$xSpoken English. 676 $a401/.41 700 $aCarlson$b Lauri$f1952-$01817724 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910971764403321 996 $a"Well" in dialogue games$94375827 997 $aUNINA