LEADER 06140oam 22007574a 450 001 9910971669803321 005 20240501132921.0 010 $a9781526109224 010 $a1526109220 010 $a9781526109934 010 $a152610993X 010 $a9781526109231 010 $a1526109239 024 7 $a10.7765/9781526109231 035 $a(CKB)3710000000600998 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001654765 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16435195 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001654765 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14981714 035 $a(PQKB)10452436 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4706932 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0001535552 035 $a(OCoLC)959951493 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse59476 035 $a(DE-B1597)659016 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781526109231 035 $a(Perlego)1526410 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000600998 100 $a20160420h20162016 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe VP Advantage$eHow running mates influence home state voting in presidential elections /$fChristopher J. Devine and Kyle C. Kopko 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aManchester, [England] :$cManchester University Press,$d2016. 210 4$dİ2016 215 $a1 online resource (216 pages) $cillustrations, tables 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 08$a9781784993382 311 08$a1784993387 311 08$a9781784993375 311 08$a1784993379 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 187-194) and index. 327 $aCover -- Half-title -- Title page -- Copyright information -- Dedication -- Table of contents -- Table of figures -- Table of tables -- Acknowledgments -- Preface -- 1 Origins and evolution of the vice presidential home state advantage -- Historical perspective -- The early republic -- Post-Reconstruction -- Post-World War II -- The modern era -- What changed? -- Is the perception of a vice presidential home state advantage really dead? -- An enduring perception -- Notes -- 2 The home state advantage is dead ? long live the home state advantage! -- Media coverage -- Content analysis: Data and methodology -- Content analysis: Results -- Content analysis: Discussion -- Presidential campaigns -- Campaign advisers -- Presidential candidates -- Conclusion -- Notes -- 3 When perception becomes campaign reality -- Vice presidential selection -- Data and methodology -- Empirical results -- Discussion -- Campaign strategy -- Case study: John Edwards, 2004 -- Case study: Sarah Palin, 2008 -- Case study: Joe Biden, 2008 -- Case study: Paul Ryan, 2012 -- Empirical analysis: Campaign visits to Wisconsin, 2012 -- Empirical analysis: Campaign advertisements in Wisconsin, 2012 -- Conclusion -- Notes -- 4 An empirical analysis of the vice presidential home state advantage (state-level data) -- The friends and neighbors hypothesis -- Empirical evidence -- Applicability to presidential elections -- Measuring the HSA -- Descriptive measures -- The Lewis-Beck and Rice equation -- Empirical results -- Causes of the vice presidential home state advantage -- Interactive effect: Population x experience -- Data and methodology -- Empirical results -- Discussion -- An alternative approach: Fixed effects regression -- Data and methodology -- Empirical results -- Conclusion -- Notes. 327 $a5 An empirical analysis of the vice presidential home state advantage (individual-level data) -- Data and methodology -- Respondent sample -- Survey measures -- Independent variables -- Dependent variables -- Empirical analysis -- Vote choice models -- Alternative HSA models -- Candidate evaluation models -- Discussion -- Conclusion -- Notes -- 6 Did LBJ really "deliver" Texas ? and the South? -- "We couldn't have won the South without Johnson" -- Vice presidential selection -- Vice presidential advantage -- "Lyndon Benedict Johnson" -- Ambition -- "Betrayal" -- Empirical analysis: ANES, 1960 -- Data and methodology -- Empirical results -- Empirical analysis: Kennedy-Johnson campaign polling -- Texas -- Louisiana -- Conclusion -- Notes -- 7 Has the vice presidential home state advantage ever decided an election? -- A historical analysis of potentially decisive vice presidential HSAs -- Historical introduction -- Historical examples -- Discussion -- A counterfactual analysis of potentially decisive vice presidential HSAs -- Qualifying elections -- Jeanne Shaheen, 2000 -- Discussion -- Conclusion -- Notes -- 8 Who votes for the running mate, anyway? -- Literature review -- Context -- Evidence -- Empirical analysis -- Vote choice models -- Candidate evaluation models -- Conclusion -- Notes -- 9 The VP advantage -- Notes -- Appendix A: Documentation of media "veepstakes" coverage -- Appendix B: Fixed effects model of Democratic vote share with interaction terms, 1884-2012 -- References -- Index. 330 8 $aPolitical commentators, campaign operatives, and presidential candidates often believe that there is a vice presidential home state advantage in presidential elections. In recent elections, presidential campaigns have even changed their strategy in response to these perceived advantages. In this volume, Kopko and Devine demonstrate that vice presidential home state advantages are highly conditional but that a vice presidential candidate could change the outcome of a presidential election. 606 $aVice-presidents$xElection$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst01166247 606 $aPresidents$xElection$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst01075747 606 $aVice-presidents$zUnited States$xElection 606 $aPresidents$zUnited States$xElection 607 $aUnited States$2fast 615 7$aVice-presidents$xElection. 615 7$aPresidents$xElection. 615 0$aVice-presidents$xElection. 615 0$aPresidents$xElection. 676 $a324.9/73 700 $aDevine$b Christopher$f1984-$01805582 702 $aKopko$b Kyle C. 801 0$bMdBmJHUP 801 1$bMdBmJHUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910971669803321 996 $aThe VP Advantage$94354260 997 $aUNINA