LEADER 03804nam 22007694a 450 001 9910971452903321 005 20251116204144.0 010 $a1-280-05271-6 010 $a1-134-43670-X 010 $a0-415-29060-0 010 $a0-203-39817-3 010 $a1-134-43669-6 024 7 $a10.4324/9780203398173 035 $a(CKB)1000000000443517 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000300555 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11226201 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000300555 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10259205 035 $a(PQKB)10947617 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000376748 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11298237 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000376748 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10337029 035 $a(PQKB)11423160 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC180852 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL180852 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10099650 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL5271 035 $a(OCoLC)437084127 035 $a(OCoLC)56366060 035 $a(BIP)46121384 035 $a(BIP)7857680 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000443517 100 $a20020625d2003 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aIs nature ever evil? $ereligion, science, and value /$fedited by Willem B. Drees 210 $aLondon ;$aNew York $cRoutledge$d2003 215 $axv, 341 p. $cill 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 08$a0-415-29061-9 311 08$a0-203-39985-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $apt. 1. Nature, science and value -- pt. 2. Evil evolutionary justified? -- pt. 3. Improving nature via culture and technology? -- pt. 4. Values as explanation or values explained? 330 $aCan nature be evil, or ugly, or wrong? Can we apply moral value to nature? From a compellingly original premise, under the auspices of major thinkers including Mary Midgley, Philip Hefner, Arnold Benz and Keith Ward, Is Nature Ever Evil? examines the value-structure of our cosmos and of the science that seeks to describe it. Science, says editor Willem B. Drees, claims to leave moral questions to aesthetic and religious theory. But the supposed neutrality of the scientific view masks a host of moral assumptions. How does an ethically transparent science arrive at concepts of a 'hostile' universe or a 'selfish' gene? How do botanists, zoologists, cosmologists and geologists respond to the beauty of the universe they study, reliant as it is upon catastrophe, savagery, power and extinction? Then there are various ways in which science seeks to alter and improve nature. What do prosthetics and gene technology, cyborgs and dairy cows say about our appreciation of nature itself? Surely science, in common with philosophy, magic and religion, can aid our understanding of evil in nature - whether as natural catasrophe, disease, predatory cruelty or mere cosmic indifference? Focusing on the ethical evaluation of nature itself, Is Nature Ever Evil? re-ignites crucial questions of hope, responsibility, and possibility in nature. 606 $aPhilosophy of nature 606 $aNature$xMoral and ethical aspects 606 $aScience$xMoral and ethical aspects 606 $aNature$xReligious aspects$xChristianity 606 $aChristian ethics 615 0$aPhilosophy of nature. 615 0$aNature$xMoral and ethical aspects. 615 0$aScience$xMoral and ethical aspects. 615 0$aNature$xReligious aspects$xChristianity. 615 0$aChristian ethics. 676 $a111/.84 701 $aDrees$b Willem B.$f1954-$0879120 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910971452903321 996 $aIs nature ever evil$94475977 997 $aUNINA