LEADER 03470nam 2200613Ia 450 001 9910971359103321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a9781593326937 010 $a1593326939 035 $a(CKB)2670000000271341 035 $a(EBL)1057844 035 $a(OCoLC)818819073 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000757013 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11413485 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000757013 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10753899 035 $a(PQKB)11411562 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1057844 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1057844 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10622733 035 $a(Perlego)2028038 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000271341 100 $a20110520d2011 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aStudent First Amendment speech and expression rights $earmbands to bong hits /$fR. Chace Ramey 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aEl Paso $cLFB Scholarly Pub.$d2011 215 $a1 online resource (193 p.) 225 1 $aLaw and society : recent scholarship 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a9781593324735 311 08$a1593324731 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aCONTENTS; PART I. Opening the School House Gates; CHAPTER 1. Wearing Tinker's Armband; CHAPTER 2. Matthew Fraser: Lewd or Just Funny?; CHAPTER 3. Extra Extra!!! The Administration Decides if YouRead all about It!; CHAPTER 4. Back to Black; CHAPTER 5. No Bong HiTS for Students ... or Jesus; PART II. Beyond Armbands, Bong HiTS, and Assemblies; CHAPTER 6. Broadly Defining Co-Curricular and School-Sponsored Activities; CHAPTER 7. Distribution of Student-Published or PromotedMaterials; CHAPTER 8. Classroom and Curricular Activities 327 $aCHAPTER 9. Student Campaigns, Elections, Protests and otherPolitical SpeechCHAPTER 10. The Student Athlete and Free Speech; CHAPTER 11. (Not) Saying the Pledge of Allegiance; CHAPTER 12. Confederate Flags, Coed Naked, and Heavy MetalIcons: What Not to Wear to School; CHAPTER 13. BF4eva ; ) - Student Posting, Texting, andBlogging - LOL...; CHAPTER 14. Free Speech or Free from Potential Harm; PART III. CHAPTER 15. Touring the Student Speech andExpression Legal Landscape; References; Index 330 $aRamey examines the legal boundaries of student speech and expression rights in school, as developed and defined by the U.S. federal courts. At issue is the proper extent of student speech and expressive conduct protected under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The purpose of discussing these decisions is to better enable educators to make informed decisions regarding student speech and expression in school. Ramey focuses on the Supreme Court's four main student speech and expression decisions: in Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Sch. Dist. (1969), Bethel Sch. Dist. v. Fraser (1986), Haz 410 0$aLaw and society (New York, N.Y.) 606 $aFreedom of expression$zUnited States 606 $aStudents$xLegal status, laws, etc$zUnited States 615 0$aFreedom of expression 615 0$aStudents$xLegal status, laws, etc. 676 $a342.7308/5 700 $aRamey$b R. Chace$f1978-$01811004 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910971359103321 996 $aStudent First Amendment speech and expression rights$94362593 997 $aUNINA