LEADER 02975nam  2200649 a 450 
001 9910971235303321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a9781589013070
010   $a1589013077
010   $a9781435627185
010   $a1435627180
035   $a(CKB)1000000000482455
035   $a(EBL)547793
035   $a(OCoLC)648711572
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000136085
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11147064
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000136085
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10064103
035   $a(PQKB)10296593
035   $a(OCoLC)614491962
035   $a(MdBmJHUP)muse15240
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL547793
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10236748
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC547793
035   $a(Perlego)949349
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000482455
100   $a20060130d2006      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aDefending probabilism $ethe moral theology of Juan Caramuel /$fJulia A. Fleming
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aWashington, D.C. $cGeorgetown University Press$dc2006
215   $a1 online resource (226 p.)
225 1 $aMoral traditions series
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311 08$a9781589011137 
311 08$a1589011139 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [153]-194) and index.
327   $aSituating probabilism: the ethical theory and its significance for Caramuel -- Advocating probabilism: Caramuel's early writings and the proof-texts they provided for his critics -- Using probabilism: avoiding improbable warfare and making peace with Protestants -- Protecting probabilism: the Apologema as an answer to probabilism's critics -- Explaining probabilism: the Apologema's project of education -- Redefining probabilism: the Dialexis de Non-Certitudine -- Remembering probabilism: the contemporary significance of Caramuel's legacy.
330   $aThrough the centuries, at the heart of Catholic moral theology is a fundamental question: How do we behave responsibly in the face of moral uncertainty? Attempts to resolve problems of everyday life led to the growth of a variety of moral systems, one of which emerged in the early 17th century and was known as probabilism. This method of solving difficult moral cases allowed the believer to rely upon a view that was judged defensible in terms of its arguments or the authorities behind it, even if the opposite opinion was supported by stronger arguments or more authorities. The theologian Juan 
410  0$aMoral traditions series.
606   $aProbabilism
606   $aChristian ethics
615  0$aProbabilism.
615  0$aChristian ethics.
676   $a241/.042092
700   $aFleming$b Julia A$01812679
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910971235303321
996   $aDefending probabilism$94365198
997   $aUNINA