LEADER 01264nam 2200337Ia 450 001 996390243703316 005 20221107222733.0 035 $a(CKB)1000000000649969 035 $a(EEBO)2240867860 035 $a(OCoLC)62369300 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000649969 100 $a20051129d1681 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||a|bb| 200 13$aTo the honourable House of Commons assembled in Parliament$b[electronic resource] $ethe case and humble petition of Benjamin Harris, bookseller prisoner in the Kings-bench 210 $a[London : s.n.]$dMar. 19, 1680/1. [i.e. 1681] 215 $a3 p 300 $aPlace of publication suggested by Wing (2nd ed.). 300 $aImprint from colophon. 300 $aReproduction of original in: Harvard University. Library. 330 $aeebo-0062 606 $aPrinting industry$xLaw and legislation$zEngland$vEarly works to 1800 615 0$aPrinting industry$xLaw and legislation 700 $aHarris$b Benjamin$fd. 1716?$01005385 712 02$aEngland and Wales.$bParliament.$bHouse of Commons. 801 0$bUMI 801 1$bUMI 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996390243703316 996 $aTo the honourable House of Commons assembled in Parliament$92417309 997 $aUNISA LEADER 01701nam 2200469 450 001 9910702688503321 005 20140918124107.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002429300 035 $a(OCoLC)890804472 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002429300 100 $a20140918j198606 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aHYTESS II, a Hypothetical Turbofan Engine Simplified Simulation with multivariable control and sensor analytical redundancy /$fWalter C. Merrill 210 1$aCleveland, Ohio :$cNational Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center,$dJune 1986. 215 $a1 online resource (20 pages, 17 unnumbered pages) $cillustrations 225 1 $aNASA technical memorandum ;$v87344 300 $a"June 1986." 606 $aComputerized simulation$2nasat 606 $aFailure analysis$2nasat 606 $aTurbofan engines$2nasat 606 $aControl theory$2nasat 606 $aFORTRAN$2nasat 606 $aPoints (mathematics)$2nasat 615 7$aComputerized simulation. 615 7$aFailure analysis. 615 7$aTurbofan engines. 615 7$aControl theory. 615 7$aFORTRAN. 615 7$aPoints (mathematics) 700 $aMerrill$b Walter C.$01397076 712 02$aLewis Research Center, 712 02$aUnited States.$bNational Aeronautics and Space Administration, 801 0$bGPO 801 1$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910702688503321 996 $aHYTESS II, a Hypothetical Turbofan Engine Simplified Simulation with multivariable control and sensor analytical redundancy$93499090 997 $aUNINA LEADER 05292nam 2200769 a 450 001 9910970998403321 005 20251116160924.0 010 $a9786610246489 010 $a9780309169691 010 $a0309169690 010 $a9781280246487 010 $a1280246480 010 $a9780309501972 010 $a0309501970 035 $a(CKB)111069351127522 035 $a(EBL)3375279 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000228021 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11186495 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000228021 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10148734 035 $a(PQKB)10907082 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3375279 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10038549 035 $a(OCoLC)923254760 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3375279 035 $a(Perlego)4735849 035 $a(BIP)7792758 035 $a(EXLCZ)99111069351127522 100 $a20020709d2002 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aProceedings of government/industry forum $ethe owner's role in project management and preproject planning /$fCommittee for Oversight and Assessment of U.S. Department of Energy Project Management, Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aWashington, D.C. $cNational Academy Press$dc2002 215 $a1 online resource (50 p.) 225 1 $aCompass series 300 $aAt head of title: Proceedings of government/industry forum. 300 $a"The Government/Industry Forum on the Own'ers ROle in Project Management and Preproject Planning, held on November 13, 2001, served as a venue for exchanging lessons learned in successful project management between major industrial corporations and the DOE."--Preface. 311 08$a9780309084253 311 08$a0309084253 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $a""Front Matter""; ""Preface""; ""Contents""; ""1 Introduction to the Government/Industry Forum""; ""2 DOE's Role as Project Owner""; ""3 DOE Project Management Accountability and Process Improvement""; ""4 The Elements of Project System Excellence""; ""5 DuPont's Role in Capital Projects""; ""6 Weyerhaeuser Capital Management Process""; ""7 ChevronTexaco Project Development and Execution Process""; ""8 Question-and-Answer Session""; ""9 Wrap-Up Observations"" 330 $aRecurrent problems with project performance in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in the 1990s raised questions in Congress about the practices and processes used by the department to manage projects. The 105th Committee of Conference on Energy and Water Resources directed DOE to investigate establishing a project review process. Many of the findings and recommendations in this series of reports identified the need for improved planning in the early project stages (front-end planning) to get the project off to the right start, and the continuous monitoring of projects by senior management to make sure the project stays on course. These reports also stressed the need for DOE to act as an owner, not a contractor, and to train its personnel to function not as traditional project managers but as knowledgeable owner's representatives in dealing with projects and contractors. The NRC Committee for Oversight and Assessment of Department of Energy Project Management determined that it would be helpful for DOE to sponsor a forum in which representatives from DOE and from leading corporations with large, successful construction programs would discuss how the owner's role is conducted in government and in industry. In so doing, the committee does not claim that all industrial firms are better at project management than the DOE. Far from it-the case studies represented at this forum were selected specifically because these firms were perceived by the committee to be exemplars of the very best practices in project management. Nor is it implied that reaching this level is easy; the industry speakers themselves show that excellence in project management is difficult to achieve and perhaps even more difficult to maintain. Nevertheless, they have been successful in doing so, through constant attention by senior management. 410 0$aCompass series (Washington, D.C.) 517 3 $aOwner's role in project management and preproject planning 606 $aProject management$zUnited States$vCongresses 606 $aPublic-private sector cooperation$zUnited States$vCongresses 606 $aFacility management$zUnited States$vCongresses 606 $aIndustrial productivity$zUnited States$xMeasurement$vCongresses 606 $aProcess control$zUnited States$vCongresses 615 0$aProject management 615 0$aPublic-private sector cooperation 615 0$aFacility management 615 0$aIndustrial productivity$xMeasurement 615 0$aProcess control 676 $a658.5/00973 712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bCommittee for Oversight and Assessment of U.S. Department of Energy Project Management. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910970998403321 996 $aProceedings of government$94358257 997 $aUNINA