LEADER 02957nam 2200697Ia 450 001 9910970379703321 005 20251117115544.0 010 $a0-19-159772-4 010 $a0-19-151920-0 010 $a9786611970420 010 $a1-281-97042-5 010 $a9786610809806 035 $a(CKB)111087313299452 035 $a(EBL)679500 035 $a(OCoLC)191826861 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000088224 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11111068 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000088224 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10071332 035 $a(PQKB)10501776 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000075606 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC679500 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL679500 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10273334 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL197042 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7034149 035 $a(PPN)170720187 035 $a(OCoLC)39868108 035 $a(FINmELB)ELB163941 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7034149 035 $a(OCoLC)1148101216 035 $a(EXLCZ)99111087313299452 100 $a19980903d1998 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aMeaning /$fPaul Horwich 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aOxford $cClarendon Press ;$aNew York $cOxford University Press$dc1998 215 $a1 online resource (254 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a0-19-823728-6 311 08$a0-19-823824-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [231]-237) and index. 327 $aContents; 1. Introduction; 2. Pseudo-Constraints on an Adequate Account of Meaning; 3. Meaning as Use; 4. Truth; 5. Reference; 6. Implicit Definition, Analytic Truth, and A Priori Knowledge; 7. The Composition of Meanings; 8. Norms of Language; 9. Quelling Quine's Qualms; 10. A Straight Solution to Kripke's Sceptical Paradox; Conclusion; Bibliography; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; Q; R; S; T; U; V; W 330 $aWhat is meaning? Paul Horwich presents an original philosophical theory, demonstrates its richness, and defends it against all comers. At the core of his theory is the idea, made famous by Wittgenstein, that the meaning of a word derives from its use; Horwich articulates this idea in a new way that will restore it to the prominence that it deserves. He surveys the diversity of valuable insights into meaning that have been gained in the twentieth century, and seeks to accommodatethem within his theory. His aim is not to correct a common-sense view of meaning, but to vindicate it: he seeks to ta 606 $aMeaning (Philosophy) 606 $aSemantics (Philosophy) 615 0$aMeaning (Philosophy) 615 0$aSemantics (Philosophy) 676 $a121/.68 700 $aHorwich$b Paul$0182965 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910970379703321 996 $aMeaning$94464764 997 $aUNINA