LEADER 03699nam  22005534a 450 
001 9910969872003321
005 20251116141113.0
010   $a9780309172325
010   $a0309172322
010   $a9780309515573
010   $a0309515572
035   $a(CKB)110986584752934
035   $a(EBL)3375364
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3375364
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10038637
035   $a(OCoLC)923255882
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3375364
035   $a(Perlego)4736892
035   $a(BIP)53855570
035   $a(BIP)6393536
035   $a(EXLCZ)99110986584752934
100   $a20000204d2000      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 00$aGrading the nation's report card $eresearch from the evaluation of NAEP /$fCommittee on the Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Educational Progress, Board on Testing and Assessment, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council ; Nambury S. Raju ... [et al.], editors
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aWashington, D.C. $cNational Academy Press$dc2000
215   $a1 online resource (277 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311 08$a9780309068444 
311 08$a0309068444 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $a""Front Matter""; ""Contents""; ""1 Introduction""; ""2 Families of Items in the NAEP Mathematics Assessment""; ""3 Student Thinking and Related Assessment: Creating a Facet-Based Learning Environment""; ""4 An External Evaluation of the 1996 Grade 8 NAEP Science Framework""; ""5 Appraising the Dimensionality of the 1996 Grade 8 NAEP Science Assessment Data""; ""6 Subject-Matter Expertsa??? Perceptions of the Relevance of the NAEP Long-Term Trend Items in Science and Mathematics""; ""7 Issues in Phasing Out Trend NAEP""; ""8 Issues in Combining State NAEP and Main NAEP""
327   $a""9 Difficulties Associated with Secondary Analysis of NAEP Data""""10 Putting Surveys, Studies, and Datasets Together: Linking NCES Surveys to One Another and to Datasets from Other Sources""; ""11 Developing Classroom Process Data for the Improvement of Teaching""
330   $aThe National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), known as the nation's report card, has chronicled students' academic achievement in America for over a quarter of a century. It has been a valued source of information about students' performance, providing the best available trend data on the academic achievement of elementary, middle, and secondary school students in key subject areas. NAEP's prominence and the important need for stable and accurate measures of academic achievement call for evaluation of the program and an analysis of the extent to which its results are reasonable, valid, and informative to the public. This volume of papers considers the use and application of NAEP. It provides technical background to the recently published book, Grading the Nation's Report Card: Evaluating NAEP and Transforming the Assessment of Educational Progress (NRC, 1999), with papers on four key topics: NAEP's assessment development, content validity, design and use, and more broadly, the design of education indicator systems.
606   $aEducational tests and measurements$zUnited States
615  0$aEducational tests and measurements
676   $a371.26/0973
701   $aRaju$b Nambury S$01806321
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910969872003321
996   $aGrading the nation's report card$94355444
997   $aUNINA