LEADER 02911nam  22005892  450 
001 9910968668003321
005 20151005020622.0
010   $a1-107-22770-4
010   $a1-139-20969-8
010   $a1-139-21469-1
010   $a1-139-21777-1
010   $a1-139-22429-8
010   $a0-511-84394-1
035   $a(CKB)2670000000147230
035   $a(EBL)3004584
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000611529
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11381319
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000611529
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10666334
035   $a(PQKB)10320738
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511843945
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3004584
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3004584
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10535786
035   $a(OCoLC)778377501
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000147230
100   $a20101027d2012||||  uy|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aCollective rights $ea legal theory /$fMiodrag A. Jovanovic?
205   $a1st ed.
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2012.
215   $a1 online resource (viii, 230 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
311 08$a1-107-00738-0 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aWhat it means for a theory of collective rights to be legal -- reflections on methodology -- Theories of rights and collectives as right-holders -- Collective rights as a distinctive legal concept -- Are there universal collective rights? -- Conclusion : collectives as the third type of right-holders.
330   $aIn a departure from the mainstream methodology of a positivist-oriented jurisprudence, Collective Rights provides the first legal-theoretical treatment of this area. It advances a normative-moral standpoint of 'value collectivism' which goes against the traditional political philosophy of liberalism and the dominant ideas of liberal multiculturalism. Moreover, it places a theoretical account of collective rights within the larger debate between proponents of different rights theories. By exploring why 'collective rights' should be differentiated from similar legal concepts, the relationship between collective and individual rights and why groups should be recognised as the third distinctive type of right-holders, it presents the topic as connected to the larger philosophical debate about international law of human rights, most notably to the problem of universality of rights.
606   $aGroup rights
615  0$aGroup rights.
676   $a340.11
686   $aPOL035010$2bisacsh
700   $aJovanovic?$b Miodrag A.$0516034
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910968668003321
996   $aCollective rights$9853634
997   $aUNINA