LEADER 02888nam  2200661 a 450 
001 9910966459903321
005 20251117115310.0
010   $a1-135-63078-X
010   $a1-135-63079-8
010   $a1-283-24125-0
010   $a9786613241252
010   $a1-4106-0963-4
024 7 $a10.4324/9781410609632 
035   $a(CKB)111087027890024
035   $a(EBL)335488
035   $a(OCoLC)476147593
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000158110
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11153039
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000158110
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10147182
035   $a(PQKB)11597843
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC335488
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL335488
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10227449
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL324125
035   $a(OCoLC)53983154
035   $a(EXLCZ)99111087027890024
100   $a20030319d2004      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aFree press vs. fair trials $eexamining publicity's role in trial outcomes /$fJon Bruschke, William E. Loges
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aMahwah, N.J. $cLawrence Erlbaum Associates$d2004
215   $a1 online resource (208 p.)
225 1 $aLEA's communication series
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311 08$a0-8058-5703-6 
311 08$a0-8058-4325-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 165-173) and indexes.
327   $aBook Cover; Title; Copyright; Contents; Foreword; Preface; Chapter One Introduction; Chapter Two What We Think We Know; Chapter Three Field Research; Chapter Four Pretrial Publicity and Media Theory: "General" Publicity Revisited; Chapter Five Conclusions; Appendix: Detailed Discussion of City-Level Data; References; Author Index; Subject Index
330   $aCurrent research on media and the law has generally been atheoretical and contradictory. This volume explains why pretrial publicity is unlikely to affect the outcome of most jury trials, despite many experimental studies claiming to show the influence of publicity. It reviews existing literature on the topic and includes results from the authors' own research in an effort to answer four questions: *Does pretrial publicity bias the outcome of trials? *If it has an effect, under what conditions does this effect emerge? *What remedies should courts apply in situations whe
410  0$aLEA's communication series.
517 3 $aFree press versus fair trials
606   $aFree press and fair trial$zUnited States
615  0$aFree press and fair trial
676   $a345.73/07
700   $aBruschke$b Jon$01882627
701   $aLoges$b William E$01882628
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910966459903321
996   $aFree press vs. fair trials$94497949
997   $aUNINA